Laserfiche WebLink
other laws, it will be in violation of its permit conditions and the above statutory requttements, and the <br />Division will procede at that time with appropriate enforcement actions. <br />5. Has the Applicant provided an adequate evaluation of the potential for uranium mineralization via <br />blasting and mining activities, and demonstrated adequate safeguazds to ensure the protection of surface <br />and groundwater resources as well as compliance with applicable federal and Colorado water quality laws <br />and regulations, as required by Rule 3.1.6? <br />DMG Response -The Applicant has provided a detailed monitoring, containment, and control plan to <br />which adequately addresses the potential for adverse impacts to human health and the environment from <br />radiation resulting from quarrying activities and to ensure the operator's compliance with all applicable <br />Federal, State, and local regulations. The monitoring, containment, and control plan as submitted by the <br />Applicant was prepazed via input from the Colorado Department of Health & Environment, to ensure that <br />any radioactivity on the site is properly controlled and contained. Further, the Applicant has committed to <br />provide written demonstration of an approved CDPS discharge permit from the Water Quality Control <br />Division, Colorado Department of Health prior to any offsite dischazge and prior to the initiation of any <br />blasting and quany activities at the MMRR Quarry. <br />6. Has the Applicant provided an adequate blast vibration analysis and blasting plan that addresses the <br />potential for adveae offsite impacts to significant, valuable, and permanent man-made stmctures, as <br />requued by Rule 6.4.4(1). Specifically, the Black Hawk/Central City Sanitation District's Water Treatment <br />Plant, Convenience Store, Silver Dollaz Metro District Light Poles, and utility lines along Colorado <br />Highway 119. <br />DMG Response -The Applicant has provided a detailed Blasting Plan prepared by Lyman Henn, <br />Consulting Engineers that provides an assessment of possible surface and subsurface impacts, a monitoring <br />plan to detect the presence or absence of offsite impacts, and proposed mitigation measures that will be <br />implemented in the event a peak particle velocity of 0.75 ips (inches per second) is detected at any structure <br />not owned or controlled by the quarry operation, or a peak particle velocity of 0.50 ips is detected at any <br />older structure with plaster-on lath walls that maybe within the zone of influence of quarry blast ground <br />vibrations. The Blasting Plan assures that potential adverse impacts to the Water Treatment Plant and <br />associated buildings, Convenience Store, Silver Dollaz Metro District Light Poles, and utility lines along <br />Highway 119 will not occur. Further, the Division has reviewed a November 1Q 2005 Blast Vibration <br />Analysis report prepared by Leonard Rice Engineers, Inc. on behalf of the Black HawkJCentral City <br />Sanitation District and the Silver Dollar Metropolitan District and has concluded that the specifications <br />agreed to by the Applicant regazding blasting procedures and mitigation measures aze adequate to meet the <br />requirements of Rule 6.4.4 (i). <br />7. Has the Applicant adequately described the game and non-game resources, including threatened and <br />endangered species, on and in the vicinity of the application area, and provided a description of the <br />impacts to such resources during mining and reclamation, and appropriate mitigation measures, as required <br />by Rule 6.4.8? <br />DMG Response -The Applicant has adequately addressed all requirements specified in Rule 6.4.8. <br />Further, the Applicant has contacted both the Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW) and the U.S. Fish & <br />Wildlife Service to confum the presence or absence of threatened, endangered, or other species of concern <br />on the site and its vicinity. There have been no written comments received from either agency which list <br />such species and requested mitigation measures. <br />8. Has the Applicant provided adequate dust control and mitigation measures? <br />