Laserfiche WebLink
r•xuzJJl'r i; <br /> <br />S. 'Phc },+uJu~~:r,l ir: located on aJ,prc,::in:+tcly 2Sp <br />acres. 'J'he a},plicr+++t sul,~nitted ~+ site p]an indicating the <br />gent-ral outline of the area to be used'r+nd f.he location for <br />i <br />I <br />the ar.phalt anc] concrete Latch plants. <br />5. B>:cavation is expected to i,ccur over a period <br />of fifteen years. ]tccl~unatiun will in}:e pL+ce concurrently <br />~+s e:•:cavation for specific areas is canpleted. Reclamation <br />will result in a series of small la}:es with ban}:s and fill <br />areas to be reseeded. <br />6. The area is not greatly developed. However, <br />there are single family dwelling units in the area and many <br />farming operations. <br />7. Property owners and residents in the area appeared <br />and objected to the proposal on the basis that increased truck <br />traffic would create traffic problems on adjacent County Roads <br />and nearby State T}ighway, the adjacent County Roads that are <br />proposed to be used as haul roads are not paved and the dust <br />would be a health hazard and would further adversely affect crops <br />and that the proposal would be generally unsightly and incompatible <br />with residential uses. <br />8. The developer of the Ptarmigan Subdivision appeared <br />and objected to the proposal on the basis that it would be <br />incompatible with the Ptarmigan Subdivision since the.Ptarmigan <br />Subdivision is located on a bluff overlooking tl~e proposed si.i_e. <br />9. Upon the testimony and evidence submitted the Board <br />finds that allowing the Latch plants as accessory uses in connection <br />with the sand and gravel extraction pi.t would not be consistent <br />with the healt}i, safety and welfare of t:he citizens and inhabitants <br />of the area due to t}Ze fe+ct that additional truck traffic would he <br />generated by the batch plants causiny additional problems with <br />r.cspect to dust and traffic control. <br />-2 <br />