My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL55965
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL55965
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:40:54 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 10:58:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981016
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
3/1/1993
Doc Name
HAWKS NEST MINE C-81-016 RECLAMATION PRIORITIES
From
DMG
To
LARRY ROUTTEN
Permit Index Doc Type
RECLAMATION PROJECTS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
available for other reclamation tasks. The state liability would <br />also add to the cost for removing the silos because of the adjacent <br />power lines and rail track used by West Elk. <br />The best situation for the Division would be to get ARCO to permit <br />the silos, and the Division to reclaim the disturbance around the <br />silos. This would include cleaning up the coal stockpile area, <br />removing the remains of the truck scale, and re-establishing proper <br />drainage control within and around the site. If ARCO does not wish <br />to permit the site, the Division needs to make a decision as to <br />leaving the silos in place. The Division could remove the conveyor <br />system and just leave the concrete silos. At a later date ARCO may <br />decide to permit the silos in the West Elk Mine. By May 1993 I <br />hope to get all of these issues resolved in order to start the <br />reclamation plan. This work will be preformed with item 2- <br />backfilling subsidence area mentioned above. <br />Bid Package Preparation <br />Bidding Period <br />Purchase Order Issuance <br />Construction Period <br />Invoice Processing <br />Notice of Cont Settlement <br />May/June 1993 <br />July/August 1993 <br />September 1993 <br />September/October 1993 <br />October 1993 <br />November 1993 <br />4. The refuse disposal area is located adjacent to the Hotchkiss <br />Landfill, and has yet to be reclaimed. Reclamation will consist of <br />cleaning out the final trench, grading & compacting the top of the <br />refuse pile, respreading stockpiled subsoil & topsoil and seeding <br />the site. <br />Delta County purchased this site in 1988 and wants to utilize the <br />final trench excavation to dispose of asbestos waste. There has <br />been no contact with Delta County Health Department since 1988 <br />regarding this issue. The Divisions initial response to this <br />request was that the open trench would probably have to serve as <br />the disposal area for excess coal, coal waste and demolished <br />structures. All of the waste materials from the previous <br />reclamation work preformed in 1991 was buried on site. The only <br />remaining use by the Division for the open trench would be to <br />dispose of the silo area coal stockpile and the broken concrete and <br />structural steel from the two storage silos. <br />I plan to contact the Delta County Health Department and find out <br />their current plans on the site before we conduct reclamation. We <br />also need to come to some final resolution regarding the storage <br />silos. If the silos need to be demolished, the trench is the <br />optimal place to dispose of the concrete. All of the material <br />could be hauled to the refuse disposal area and graded out over the <br />top of the existing pile prior to covering the waste with subsoil <br />and topsoil. There would be no disposal charge of the concrete if <br />it were disposed of in this matter. It would be ideal to reclaim <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.