My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL54519
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL54519
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:39:45 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 9:34:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999002
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
7/22/1999
Doc Name
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT VOLUME 2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
between MP 8 and MP 15. Everything in this section would drain towazd the <br />second Piceance Creek crossing in Section 32, T2S, R96W. <br />The next drainage section would include the section between the highest <br />elevation point neaz the Cb Tract to the upper end of the pipelline corridor on <br />Bames Ridge in Section 15, T4S, R96W, between MP 15 and MP 2;fS. All pipeline <br />product in this section would drain into Stewart Gulch. This section would <br />include one pair of manual shutoff valves at MP 15.5. <br />As the pipeline corridor progresses east from Bames Ridge, it crosses over into <br />another drainage basin, creating a drainage section between MP 23.5 and MP 27.5. <br />All product in this section would drain to the Dry Fork Stewart Gulch. <br />The next drainage section is the largest and spans from MP 27S south to the <br />Pazachiute Site. This is the largest drainage section since it covers all of the <br />Parachute Creek drainage basin. This section would include one pair of manual <br />shutoff valves at MP 35. <br />4.3 Pipeline Spill Contingency <br />For the most part, two types of "spills" might possibly occur during operation of <br />the two pipelines. The first type would include a small pipeline leak that may be <br />detectable by instrumentation readings (i.e., flow in versus flow out) or by • <br />saturated soils observed during inspection of the pipeline. The second type of <br />spill would include a catastrophic pipeline failure brought on by a major accident <br />or natural disaster (e.g., a rockslide). It should be noted that design of the pipe, <br />which includes steel casing, fusion bonded epoxy, and several inches of <br />insulation, should be more than adequate to withstand greatber damage than <br />similar pipes used for natural gas in the project vicinity. <br />As part of the standazd pipeline operating procedures, the pipelines will be <br />monitored continuously for pressure and flow and will be visually inspected <br />periodically during operations. If a pipeline leak is suspected based on <br />monitoring (e.g., an abrupt drop in pressure), American Soda would <br />immediately implement emergency .procedures. Under most circumstances, the <br />input valves to both pipelines would be shut down until the situation is <br />rectified. <br />Personnel from both the Piceance Site and the Parachute Site would mobilize to <br />the pipeline corridor as soon as possible after receiving a report or indication of a <br />pipeline breach. High priority azeas would be checked by vehicle first. These <br />areas include both Piceance Creek crossings, both Pazachute Creek crossings, the <br />four major county road crossings (two on Rio Blanco County Road 5 and two on <br />Garfield County Road 215), and Davis Point. If no observable pipeline breach is <br />detected, secondary areas including Collins Gulch (Rio Blanco County Road 3) <br />and Stewart Gulch would be observed by vehicle.• If no observable pipeline <br />Pipeline Plan of Development ~ <br />Yanl~ee Gulch Sodium MineraLS Project <br />Hmecion Soda. LI3. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.