Laserfiche WebLink
VI. Ground Water Hydrology -Rules 2.04.5, 2.04.7, <br />2. and 5 <br />Information pertaining to ground water hydrology can be found on <br />pages 58-70 of the permit application. <br />Two ground water systems exist within the permit and adjacent area: <br />conventional bedrock ground water and the alluvial ground water to be <br />discussed in Section VII, Alluvial Valley Floors of this document. <br />The existence of conventional bedrock ground water can be ohserved three <br />ways: ground water monitoring wells, springs and seeps, and flow into <br />the underground workings. Monitoring wells controlled by adjacent mines <br />show that the only regional ground water aquifer existing within this <br />permit area is the Tow Creek Sandstone, As shown on Figure 1 of this <br />document, the Tow Creek Sandstone is separated from the coal seam to he <br />mined by 600 feet of interbedded sandstones, shales and siltstones. <br />These units have a very low vertical permeability, except possibly where <br />faulted, <br />Sunland conducted a spring survey to observe other possible ground water <br />aquifers in the permit and adjacent area. The spring survey (Map <br />Exhibit P of the permit application) identified several springs in and <br />adjacent to the permit area. These springs within the permit area and <br />those to the northwest near Middle Creek do not appear to be fault or <br />fracture controlled. Rather, they appear to be stratigraphically <br />controlled, perched aquifers, This conclusion is substantiated by the <br />lnw electro-conductivity indicating a short flow path hetween the <br />recharge and discharge areas. <br />These springs, located one-half mile northwest of the mine workings, are <br />the only springs that could be impacted by mining, Some minor effects to <br />the quantity of flow from these springs might be realized due to <br />subsidence above the workings. To date, ne problems have been noted with <br />these springs. If a worst-case analysis assumes that all of the flow <br />from the springs would be interrupted, the resultant flow reduction in <br />Middle Creek would be 0.02 cubic feet per second, This amount is <br />insignificant to the flow of Middle Creek. <br />A mine inflow study was also undertaken by Sunland. This information is <br />provided on Map 1 of the permit application. This map shows that the <br />mine inflow is restricted to floor seeps occurring in Fault Block Nn. 1 <br />and the total rate of water production underground is 40 gallons per <br />hour, An underground inspection of the mine was conducted by the <br />Division which confirmed that absolutely no water was being made th m ugh <br />the fault zones even in areas where the mine is lower than Trout Creek <br />stream level, Amine sump water sample was taken and the analysis is <br />presented on page 59 of the permit application. This analysis shows <br />acceptable water quality as defined for the Trout Creek drainage by the <br />Colorado Departrre nt of Health, Water Quality Control Commission, The <br />mine inflow study and sump water analysis will be conducted on an annual <br />-10- <br />