My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL52532
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL52532
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:38:22 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:48:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981011
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
5/16/1988
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION & FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE FOR RN1
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
basis rather than monitoring ground water by a bedrock monitoring well <br />network. The mine inflow study and the spring survey will detect any <br />affects to the prevailing hydrologic balance earlier than a monitoring <br />well grid, To date, no affects have been observed. <br />The operation is in compliance with the requirements of this section, <br />VII. Alluvial Valley Floors - Rules 2.06.8 and 4.24 <br />Information pertaining to alluvial valley floors (AVF) is presented on <br />pages 65-65,05 of the permit application. <br />From the information suhmittad, the Division has determined that Trout <br />Creek and Middle Creek meet the criteria of an AVF. As depicted on Map 2 <br />of this document, the Trout Creek AVF runs through the southeast portion <br />of the permit area and the Middle Creek AVF is located about 4000 feet <br />northwest of the permit area, The nearest agricultural activity is, <br />however, over one mile downstream along Trout Creek and approximately <br />4000 feet to the northwest in the next drainage of Middle Creek, Neither <br />AVF will be undermined, The mine entries have been driven into the <br />northwest hillside above and away from Trout Creek. <br />The requirements of Rule 2.06.8(5)(a) are rot applicable if certain <br />conditions were met prior to August 3, 1977, A review of Colorado <br />Division of Mines records indicates that Sunland produced coal in <br />commercial quantities from the Apex No, 2 Mine in 1976, Also, Routt <br />County issued a Special Use permit to Sunland in 1476. These factors <br />reveal Sunland does qualify for an exemption from Rule 2, 06.8(5)(a) as <br />allowed in Rule 2.06.8(5)(a)(i)(B). This exemption was granted with the <br />original permit approval and the Division has received no new information <br />that causes a modification to this exemption, <br />The geographical extent of the exemption was determined by the Division <br />to he that area permitted by Routt County in 1976. Therefore the Apex <br />No, 2 Mine is exempt fmm Rules 2,06.8(5)(a) for those areas within the <br />Federal lease excluding the SE 1/4 SW 1/4 and SE 1/4 NW 1/4 of Section 22 <br />for surface facilities. <br />Although Apex No, 2 does have this exemption, the performance standards <br />of Rule 4,24 still are applicable, The performance standards require <br />that the essential hydrologic functions, the agricultural utility and the <br />level of productivity of both the Trout Creek and Middle Creek AVF's will <br />be reestablished as part of reclamatior, The Division has determined <br />that Sunland will meet this performance standard as addressed below. <br />As defined in Rule 4,24, essential hydrologic functions of the Trout <br />Creek AVF are the existence of an alluvial aquifer and subirrigation, <br />Because the alluvial deposits have not and will not be disturbed, the <br />natural flow of the alluvial aquifer will not be modified nor will the <br />amount of water within the alluvium be changed. As previously discussed <br />in the Surface and Ground Water sections (Section V and YI, <br />respectively), nn changes in the water quality of Trout Creek have been <br />detected nor are any changes anticipated, No changes in water quality <br />are anticipated because of the magnitude of dilution, 1 part water from <br />the permit area to over 10,000 parts water fmm the stream, <br />_l 1 _ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.