My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL51430
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL51430
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:37:40 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 6:47:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
9/10/2004
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for RN4
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RECLAMATION CONTOURS AT THE LOADOUT WILL BE DETERMINED AFTER <br />REVIEW AND FINAL APPROVAL BY THE DIVISION. <br />Status -Terminated and Replaced <br />The Division initiated a reevaluation of the bond in February 1994, and identified additional <br />concerns. These concerns have been identified in a new stipulation, Stipulation No. 24 (see <br />below). The bond is being reviewed pursuant to the procedures of 3.02.2(4). The bond estimate <br />by the Division was completed on June 17, 1994 and hand delivered to the operator on June 22, <br />1994. <br />STIPULATION N0.24 <br />AS A COMPONENT OF THE 1994 PERMIT RENEWAL AND BOND ESTIMATE REVIEW, <br />THE DIVISION HAS DETERMINED THAT THE CURRENT EFCI RECLAMATION PLAN <br />IS DEFICIENT IN THE FOLLOWING AREAS: <br />THE MASS BALANCE FOR THE OVERBURDEN AND TOPSOIL FOR THE FINAL <br />REFUSE PILE CONFIGURATION NEEDS TO BE CALCULATED AND IF ANY <br />DEFICIT IS FOUND, EFCI NEEDS TO SUBMIT A PLAN TO MAKE UP THE <br />DIFFERENCE IN OVERBURDEN AND TOPSOIL. <br />2. FINAL DEPOSITION OF THE ON-SITE CONCRETE NEEDS TO BE CLARIFIED IN <br />THE PERMIT. <br />3. SHOULD EFCI WISH TO PURSUE AN ALTERATION FROM THE PRESENTLY <br />APPROVED POST-MINING CONTOURS AND CONFIGURATION AT THE <br />LOADOUT, THIS ISSUE NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED IN A TECHNICAL <br />REVISION TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DIVISION. <br />4. IN ORDER TO VERIFY FACILITY BACKFILL VOLUMES, THE OPERATOR WILL <br />PROVIDE AN ACCURATE CURRENT TOPOGRAPHIC/CONTOUR MAP WITH <br />APPLICABLE CROSS-SECTIONS TO REVISE MAPS 6 AND 7. <br />THE ABOVE ISSUES ARE TO BE RESOLVED IN A REVISION(S) TO BE <br />SUBMITTED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF PERMIT RENEWAL. <br />Status-Terminated <br />This stipulation was resolved with Technical Revision 20, which was approved on 22 September <br />1995. <br />Southfield Mine Permit Renewal 04 11 September 10, 2004 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.