My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL47018
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL47018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:21:36 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 3:04:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
8/12/1983
Doc Name
Reduction in monitoring response letter
From
MLRD
To
BOB LIDDLE
Permit Index Doc Type
STIPULATIONS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />_~ . <br />,r ,.- <br />-2- August 12, 1983 <br />Water quality monitoring should be continued for all alluvial wells <br />(Sylvester Gulch and North Fork of the Gunnison) and wells completed in <br />unconsolidated (colluvial) deposits within the area of surface <br />facilities. Tnis monitoring should be conducted quarterly for the <br />electro-conductivity and temperature. <br />Ground Water Quantity <br />All monitoring wells completed within rock strata, unconsolidated <br />deposits and alluvium snould be monitored monthly. This monitoring <br />snould consist of measurements of water levels. All water level data for <br />each well should be plotted on separate hydro graphs for inclusion in the <br />annual hydrologic reports. <br />Flow rates should oe monitored for all springs and seeps between the Ury <br />Fork of Minnesota Creek and the North Fork of the Gunnison (located on <br />Exnibit 2.8.88 of the application). Flow rates are to be monitored <br />monthly except when snow pack restricts access. Measurements of pH, <br />electro-conductivity and temperature may be dropped for springs and seeps <br />located in the Dr~ Creek Drainage and located above the "F" seam crop <br />line in the North Fork Drainage. The monitoring of spring and seep flows <br />were required 1) to insure an adequate baseline for future permits in the <br />Dry Fork Drainage 2) to quantify the impacts of mining in the North Fork <br />drainage and 3) to detect any unforeseen impacts to springs and seeps in <br />the Dry Fork drainage. <br />Surface Water Quality <br />The monitoring of surface water quality in the Minnesota Creek Basin may <br />be reduced to monthly monitoring of field parameters of pH, <br />electro-conductivity and temperature. Quarterly laboratory analyses of <br />surface waters in the rlinnesota Creek basin are not necessary, given that <br />no surface facilities (i.e. entries, escape ways, ventilation shafts, <br />mine roads, etc.) are presently located in or planned for construction in <br />this drainage basin. Surface water quality samples should still be <br />collected and analyzed for the reduced parameter list (Attachment A) at <br />the following stations: North Fork above Mine, North Fork oelow Mine, <br />and Sylvester Gulch (quarterly). <br />Surface Water Quantity <br />Continuous recordings of stream flows should be continued at all surface <br />water stations. The continuous recording surface water monitoring <br />stations should be maintained and upgraded to improve the collection of <br />stream flows. N good baseline on the Minnesota Creek Basin and effects <br />of mining on surface water flow will be critical in future permitting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.