My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL46713
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL46713
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:20:56 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 2:52:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
9/30/1992
Doc Name
RESPONSES TO TELEPHONE CONVERSATION OF 09/17/1992
From
DMG
To
WESTERN FUELS COLO
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4. A question arose regarding changes to the monitoring program currently in <br />use for the reclaimed portion of the New Horizon Mine. It is our under- <br />standing that the Division approved a reduced monitoring program that <br />would be initiated once the status of the mine changed to "Temporary <br />Cessation." We understand that Western Fuels-Colorado would now like <br />this reduced-frequency program to be allowed to continue at the reclaimed <br />portion once the Fast portion becomes active in 1993. <br />The Division believes that once the permit status changes from "Temporary <br />Cessation" to "Active,"the monitoring program approved for "Active" status <br />should be implemented at both areas. We believe that as the current crop <br />planted at the reclaimed area is a sterile, non-replenishing cover, it will need <br />to be disced under and replaced by the approved final seed mix. This <br />activity may create a surface disturbance that could lead to increased <br />sediment levels in surface water runoff. We believe the monitoring program <br />for the reclaimed area should be one that would be able to monitor these <br />levels, and therefore recommend the previously approved monitoring <br />program be implemented. <br />5. The next topic of discussion centered around whether the Phase I Bond <br />Release Request for the reclaimed portion could be submitted as part of the <br />Permit Renewal application. <br />The answer to this is no, as these processes have separate and different <br />procedures for "completeness" reviews and public notification. The proce- <br />dures for Permit Renewals are addressed in Rules 2.08.5(2)(c) and 2.07.3, <br />while those addressing Bond Release Requests are found in Rule 3.03.2. <br />6. The next question posed dealt with the administrative procedures required <br />to allow Western Fuels-Colorado to begin removal of company-owned <br />structures within the current permit area. Specifically, questions were raised <br />as to whether this activity would require notifications to the public or any <br />type of application for revision. <br />The Division has concluded that if these stnuctures were included in the <br />sections of the permit that addressed the description of "affected area," and <br />if removal if these structures has been approved by the Division, then no <br />additional permitting actions or public notifications are necessary. However, <br />if these structures are currently not within the approved "affected area" <br />boundary, or if they are but were not approved for removal, then Western <br />Fuels-Colorado will need to file a revision to the permit. A Technical <br />Revision should be filed to add new "affected", and possibly new permit, <br />area if these structures lie outside of the currently approved "affected area". <br />A Minor Revision should be filed if these structures are within the approved <br />"affected area" but were not previously approved for removal. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.