My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL45296
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL45296
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:14:18 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 1:41:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981165
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
8/12/1981
Doc Name
NEGLECTED MINE OUR FN 81-165
From
MLR
To
RICKETTS & RINDAHL CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Gilbert F. Rindahl <br />August 12, 1981 <br />Page -3- <br /> <br />~( 8. It is not clear from the text and the maps which of the existing <br />~\ mine shafts will be rehabilitated for use in underground mining. <br />9. In general, the data given is insufficient for the staff to judge the <br />SY;N p, safety of this operation and to ascertain whether or not the cyanide <br />~ru system will be closed. <br />Exhibit D - Wildlife <br />1. The impact statement from the Division of Wildlife indicates that <br />this is an "elk calving and nursing area." This seems to be the <br />~ reason for the indicated "moderate" impact. How will the impact <br />Q NFcSr~°° on elk be mitigated? More generally, how will wildlife be protected <br />from potentially hazardous materials? <br />2. Water Resources <br />~_+~~ t7a. How much water is to be used in this operation and what is the <br />r.51' industrial use water right associated with this water? <br />b. How are drainages to be protected from sedimentation and <br />D~k°'i'~ possible surface contamination during the mining and milling <br />operations'? <br />c. How are groundwater systems to be protected from seepage of <br />potentially toxic waters from the various tailings disposal <br />areas? How will potential seepage be detected? <br />(~3. Soils <br />The soils paragraph does not seem to make sense. Is the topsoil <br />composed of loams oi~ depths of 2.5 to 3 feet, or is it stony and <br />only 4 to 8 inches deep? If it is the shallower, stony soil, <br />what type soil is this? In either case, all of the topsoil <br />should be stripped for use in reclamation. Where is the topsoil <br />found and where is it absent? <br />Exhibit E <br />l.o l2 Under exhibit D, page 1, the vegetation on the site includes three <br />~ „,~„q trees species. Some of these species should be replanted in recla- <br />ti~ et,.?mation. <br />2. The diversity of the reclamation seed mix is not high enough to ensure <br />~( establishment of a diverse, long-lasting vegetative cover. I suggest <br />\ that more species be added, including a legume and a greater number <br />of adapted grass species. <br />~3. What are the recommendations concerning fertilization during recla- <br />mation? <br />4. How are the various tailings disposal areas to be reclaimed? Will <br />,~ ,~s'}` izthere not be some special methods associated with the reclaiming of <br />MI~ s bR d,~ytailings? For example, will tailings composition (pH, heavy metals, <br />~~'""PQa~~S etc. ) <br />5` <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.