My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL44501
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL44501
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:13:16 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 1:06:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/29/1982
Doc Name
SYNOPSIS OF JUNE 6 1982 MEETING BETWEEN COLO MLRD AND UTAH INTERNATIONAL
From
MLR
To
TRAPPER MINE
Permit Index Doc Type
STIPULATIONS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />-2- <br />3. Stipulation 115 (Sediment pond design). Trapper is providing the <br />original P.E. certification as requested by MLR. With receipt of thi.=. <br />information, the issue is resolved. <br />4. Stipulation 1112 (Fly ash disposal). Discussion of Dave Craig's <br />June 15, 1982 memo occurred. Utah stated that the predictive model <br />employed to determine the post-mining potentiometric. surface was the <br />"full bathtub" model, and that this was the worst case situation. <br />Calculations indicate that a 10-foot buffer zone above this surface is <br />sufficient. MLR agreed to the. worst case situation and 10-foot buffer, <br />providing Utah's calculations (to be provided) demonstrate the adequacy <br />of the buffer. <br />Much discussion occurred on the stream buffer zone for fly ash placement. <br />In summary, the Division can reduce the required buffer zone to 50 feet <br />either side of the reconstructed drainage if U.I. can provide more <br />specificity with regard to actual siting of the reconstructed stream. <br />The Division believes that the siting of the reclaimed stream channels <br />should be finalized prior Co mining occurring within the buffer zone. <br />The Division interprets the buffer zone to commence 700' from any <br />existing stream channel. Considerable discussion ensued regarding this <br />interpretation. Jim Pendleton suggested that, if the final stream <br />location could not be determined at this time, a commitment to complete <br />the determination prior to entering the 700' buffer would be acceptable. <br />Utah will consider this option. <br />An agreement was reached on pit floor ash disposal. Pit floor ash dispoe~al <br />is acceptable for the Enfield pit. Pit floor ash disposal is acceptable <br />for the Derringer pit given that Utah will provide a map (of D pit <br />disposal areas), monitoring wells, and incorporation of D pit specifics <br />into the disposal plan. Pit floor ash disposal may not occur in Ashmore pit. <br />Ash disposal in Ashmore pit may occur 10 feet above the pit floor and 5 <br />feet below the regraded surface. <br />The 9:1 ratio is operationally unfeasible to achieve, therefore, this; <br />point was agreed to be moot. <br />The contents of the waste disposal plan were discussed. Utah will submit <br />revised/additional pages on this subject. <br />5. Stipulation 1113 (Municipal waste disposal). 'ILRD is reconsidering <br />the U.I. plan as presented. Division decision to approve or modify wi71 <br />be issued in one week. Utah will submit language indicating limit nr <br />quantity of municipal waste placed at northern end of the pits. <br />Stipulation 1114 (Ground water monitoring). Utah submitted the eva]uation <br />of samples at the industrial waste pond. Preliminary evaluation by the <br />Division indicates this issue is resolved. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.