My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL43723
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL43723
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:12:33 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 12:36:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Name
US BANKRUPTCY COURT DMG OBJECTION TO THE LENDERS MOTION FOR ADEQUATE PROTECTION AND FOR RELIEF
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
During Permit Renewal RN-03 in 1998 and <br />1999, the Division identified a deficiency <br />with regard to the adequacy of the South <br />Mine de-watering system, for the long-term <br />(ie. permanent) post-mining situation. The <br />primary component of the de-watering system <br />is a 6 inch pipe siphon system, which <br />outlets through the ~~Northwest Intake <br />Portal," an air shaft which was backfilled <br />in the early 1990's. In order for the <br />siphon to function properly, perpetual <br />monitoring of the water level in the mine <br />is required. If the siphon does not. <br />function properly, water levels would rise <br />to the level of the backfilled Northwest <br />Intake Portal, likely resulting in <br />uncontrolled discharge, with the <br />possibility of a catastrophic "blowout" <br />that could create a hazard on Interstate <br />Highway 70, located adjacent to and down- <br />aradient from the portal. <br />(November 8, 2000 letter from David Berry to Jim Stover, p. 2 <br />(emphasis added): see, Declaration, ~ 5.) <br />As described in the Declaration, other significant <br />hazards to public health, safety, and the environment will <br />also remain unabated if the Debtor Powderhorn does not <br />faithfully perform the reclamation work. <br />The Colorado Coal Act required Powderhorn to post <br />environmental reclamation bonds in the aggregate amount of <br />52.9 million. See, C.R.S. ~ 39-33-113 and 2 C.C.R. ~ 907-2, <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.