My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL41775
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL41775
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:10:07 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 11:23:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
3/1/1983
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION AND FINDING OF COMPLIANCE
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• -16 • <br />uurposes. Water availability and the geomorphic criteria discussed above <br />make it uneconomical to construct a flood irrigation system. <br />An irrigation ditch does cross the norttrern part of the permit area (see <br />Exhiuit II of the permit application). This ditch transmits water <br />diverted from the San i4iyuel River further upstream. The applicant does <br />not propose to disturb this ditch. The ditch does not receive any water <br />from the mine area. Therefore, no mine-related water quality impacts are <br />anticipated for water in the ditch. <br />subirrigation <br />A small amount of subirrigation does occur along the Tuttle Uraw stream <br />channel. f•luch of the alluvial ground water along Tuttle Draw is a result <br />of seepage from the irrigation ditch that was discussed above (see <br />Exhibit II of the permit application). In many areas where the <br />subirrigation occurs, the vegetation and soil quickly dry up arhen the <br />ditch is turned off from October to June. The subirrigation along Tuttle <br />Draw is not considered extensive enough to support agricultural <br />development. <br />Conclusion <br />Based on the preceding discussion, it is concluded that no alluvial <br />valley flours exist in either the permit area ur the potentially affected <br />area associated with Nucla Mine. <br />Reference Cited <br />United States E.P.A., 1977, Subirrigated alluvial valley floors: A <br />reconnaissance of their properties and occurrence in coal resource <br />lands in the interior Western United States. <br />VIII. Probable Hydrologic Consequences of Mining and Cumulat <br />This Cumulative Hydrologic Impacts Study (CHIS) is intended to assess the <br />probable cumulative hydrologic impacts of all anticipated coal mining <br />operations upon the general area of the mine. It is to include all <br />operations for which (•iLRU applications have been submitted and iruludes <br />the anticipated total life of mine. <br />For the purposes of this CH[S it was found that no other existing or <br />proposed coal mining operations exist near the Nucla Mine that need be <br />considered for cumulative impacts. Furthermore, the total anticipated <br />life of mine for the tJucla !•Iine does not extend past this five year <br />permit term, Therefore, the probable hydrologic consequences for this <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.