Laserfiche WebLink
-_ ~ <br />• • -15- • <br />The ditch and two ponds are decreed for sediment settling (storage right) <br />as well as for dust control and wildlife use. <br />There are no additional uses of water at the mine that would require a <br />water right, storage right, or permit. Furthermore, the applicant's <br />statement of probable hydrologic consequences does not predict any impact <br />that is or could occur so as to injure adjacent water users. <br />VII. Alluvial Valley Floors -Rules 2.06.8, 4.24 <br />The applicant has conducted a reconnaissance level alluvial valley floor <br />(AVF) study for the proposed mine and adjacent areas. Only one drainage, <br />Tuttle Uraw, was identified as a potential AVF (see Exhibit II of the <br />permit application). The San Miguel River was not taken into <br />consideration. Therefore, the Division undertook a study to determine if <br />the San Miguel River potential AUF could be considered to be adjacent to <br />the Nucla Mine. <br />The San Miguel River is located about 2 1/2 miles from the Nucla Mine. <br />Based only upon visual observations, it is likely that the San Miguel <br />River would be identified as an AVF. However, the distance separatiny <br />the mine from the river is probably sufficient enough to mitigate any <br />impacts that may occur. In addition, the amount of flow that is <br />contributed by Tuttle Draw to the San Miguel River is very small in <br />comparison to the the total flow in the river. No mine-related <br />hydroloyic impacts are anticipated to occur in the San Miguel River <br />hydrologic system. Therefore, tfre San fliyuel River is considered to be <br />located outside of the potentially afFected area and will not be <br />discussed further in the AVF portion of this document. <br />Tuttle Draw was considered to be a potential alluvial valley floor by the <br />applicant based solely upon the identification of unconsolidated <br />stream-laid deposits. The results of the applicant's study indicate that <br />Tuttle Draw does not meet the necessary irrigation criteria to be <br />identified as an AVF. This conclusion is substantiated by the results of <br />a EPA alluvial valley floor study (EPA, 1977) done in western U.S. The <br />basis fur this conclusion is discussed in greater detail below. <br />Geomorphology <br />The applicant has identified about 20 acres along Tuttle Draw which are <br />underlain by unconsolidated stream-laid deposits (see Exhibit II of the <br />permit application). These areas are not considered extensive enouyh to <br />permit the construction of an effective irrigation system. <br />Flood Irrigation <br />Water in Tuttle Uraar is not currently diverted for flood irrigation <br />