My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL41775
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL41775
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 8:10:07 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 11:23:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
3/1/1983
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION AND FINDING OF COMPLIANCE
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• -II- • <br />five year mine plan are also the total cumulative hydrologic impacts. <br />A. Surface Water <br />Surface water monitoring has identified changes between the upstream <br />monitoriny site (above mine) and the downstream monitoring site (below <br />mine) on Tuttle Draw. <br />Flows in Tuttle Creek increase an annual averaye of 11U% (based on 19811, <br />1981 data) from the upstream site (S41 N-1) to the downstream site (SW <br />IJ-3)as identified on Exhibit 7-2 of the application. Part of this <br />increase can be attributed to the fact brat the watershed drainage area <br />increases between the two sites. However, the major reason for the <br />increase appears to be an unnatural source of contributing water. Flaw <br />data from the tributaries within the permit area reveal that discharge <br />monitoring point~UUl contributes the majority of flow for most of the <br />year. field visits to the mine revealed that the source of the water is <br />irrigation return flows. The lands north and northwest of the permit <br />area are intensely flood irrigated primarily with water from the San <br />Miguel River. Irrigation return flows (interflow) are intercepted by the <br />mine pits and are pumped into the Tuttle Draw drainaye. <br />This flow phenomenon is significant in two ways. The irrigation return <br />flows dilute the mine affected waters as well as the natural Tuttle Draw <br />flows. And secondly, the irrigation return flows serve as an unnatural <br />source of water that becomes affected as it passes through the mine pits <br />and spoils. <br />The irrigation return flow water is, very high in total dissolved solids <br />and nitrate. This ~rieans that baseline water flowing tlirougl~ the mine <br />area already has a poor water quality. This unnatural volume of water <br />flowing through the mine also increases the potential for leaching of <br />spoil material. Nlthough it is recognized that this condition exists, <br />insufficient data exists to quantitatively determine the precise <br />magnitude of the increase. To help monitor the impacts of the irrigation <br />return flows, Peabody Coal Company has proposed to visually monitor the <br />quantity of pit inflow on a monthly basis and to monitor the quality of <br />the inflow on a quarterly basis for those parameters listed in attachment <br />R of the permit application. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.