Laserfiche WebLink
• -II- • <br />five year mine plan are also the total cumulative hydrologic impacts. <br />A. Surface Water <br />Surface water monitoring has identified changes between the upstream <br />monitoriny site (above mine) and the downstream monitoring site (below <br />mine) on Tuttle Draw. <br />Flows in Tuttle Creek increase an annual averaye of 11U% (based on 19811, <br />1981 data) from the upstream site (S41 N-1) to the downstream site (SW <br />IJ-3)as identified on Exhibit 7-2 of the application. Part of this <br />increase can be attributed to the fact brat the watershed drainage area <br />increases between the two sites. However, the major reason for the <br />increase appears to be an unnatural source of contributing water. Flaw <br />data from the tributaries within the permit area reveal that discharge <br />monitoring point~UUl contributes the majority of flow for most of the <br />year. field visits to the mine revealed that the source of the water is <br />irrigation return flows. The lands north and northwest of the permit <br />area are intensely flood irrigated primarily with water from the San <br />Miguel River. Irrigation return flows (interflow) are intercepted by the <br />mine pits and are pumped into the Tuttle Draw drainaye. <br />This flow phenomenon is significant in two ways. The irrigation return <br />flows dilute the mine affected waters as well as the natural Tuttle Draw <br />flows. And secondly, the irrigation return flows serve as an unnatural <br />source of water that becomes affected as it passes through the mine pits <br />and spoils. <br />The irrigation return flow water is, very high in total dissolved solids <br />and nitrate. This ~rieans that baseline water flowing tlirougl~ the mine <br />area already has a poor water quality. This unnatural volume of water <br />flowing through the mine also increases the potential for leaching of <br />spoil material. Nlthough it is recognized that this condition exists, <br />insufficient data exists to quantitatively determine the precise <br />magnitude of the increase. To help monitor the impacts of the irrigation <br />return flows, Peabody Coal Company has proposed to visually monitor the <br />quantity of pit inflow on a monthly basis and to monitor the quality of <br />the inflow on a quarterly basis for those parameters listed in attachment <br />R of the permit application. <br />