Laserfiche WebLink
Or ~U-2 . ~ <br />INTRODUCTION <br />To contextually appreciate the involvement of the EPA in <br />Aspen and the administrative and legal actions that followed (and, <br />as of this writing, continue), a brief history of the discovery and <br />development of the Aspen ore deposits particularly as it relates to <br />Smuggler mountain and the Smuggler mine is in order. An <br />abbreviated discussion of the geology of the mineral deposits and <br />the mining methods used to extract them is also included. <br />The EPA <br />The first indication of potential contamination problems as <br />a result of Aspen's mining past came in 1981 when a Colorado State <br />University graduate student in agronomy reported high levels of <br />lead in flowers and vegetables grown in what became the Smuggler <br />Superfund Site.' EPA began investigation into the potential extent <br />' I have been informed that EPA, oddly, disclaims any precision as <br />to the locations of boundaries of its Superfund Site or the demarcation <br />between OU-1 and OU-2. Excellent mapping has been done by the private <br />sector and the demarcations of property ownership are clearly <br />established. Accordingly, I have used private sector material in my <br />descriptions and assumed that the demarcation between OU-1 and OU-2 is <br />coincidental with the long established, popularly recognized Della-S. <br />compromise line which, in turn, is coincident with the westerly endline <br />of the Smuggler Lode, USMS No. 1656, as patented and as extended <br />northerly. <br />' Details concerning the Environmental Protection Agency's <br />activities in Aspen are taken from N. A. MANGONE, Txe EFFECT OF A SUPERFUND SITE <br />DESIGNATION ON PROPERTY VALUES - $NUCGLER MOUNTAIN, ASPEN, COLORADO: A CASE STUDY, 7D <br />DENVER UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 511-535 (1993) (hereinafter the "MANGDNE ARTICLE"). <br />The background portion of the MANGONE ARTICLE, id. 513-517, does not <br />differentiate between OU-1 and OU-2. <br />I must point out that there are several errors of fact in the <br />first part of the background section of the MANGONE ARTICLE, id. 513-514, <br />for example but not limited to the misnaming of the first railroad into <br />Aspen in 1887 as the Denver b Rio Grande Western instead of the Denver <br />b Rio Grande ("Western" was not added until a court-ordered <br />reorganization in November 1920), and the use of the term "Weber" for the <br />rock unit overlying the Leadville Limestone (this miscorrelation has been <br />recognized since 1944; the correct term is the Belden Formation; the <br />continued and equally inaccurate use of the term "Weber" by mining <br />engineers in the source cited by Ms. Mangone has been long and widely <br />recognized). The definitions of "breccia" and "stope" are incomplete and <br />misleading. <br />Bruce A. Collins - ix - SHUGGLER BIBLIOGRAPHY <br />