Laserfiche WebLink
} <br />the BOCC states that the conditional use request is "GRANTED, in <br />concurrence with the recommendation of the Planning Commission." <br />(Emphasis added.) The conditional use permit is subject to six <br />conditions--the four conditions recommended by the staff to the <br />Planning Commission and the two additional conditions that the <br />Planning Commission had recommended. However, the sixth condition <br />in the approval letter is slightly rewritten. Instead of referring <br />to Mrs. Allen's place or Mrs. Allen's property, the letter refers <br />to the "property line of existing property owners". See Exhibit I. <br />On January 26, 1993, the Planning and Development Director <br />wrote Brannan and explained that, in his opinion, Condition No. 6 <br />of Brannan's conditional use permit should be interpreted to <br />require the asphalt plant to be located at least 1,000 feet from <br />all existing property lines. See Exhibit J. <br />Brannan has requested the Board of Adjustment to review this <br />interpretation because it converts the BOCC an~roval of the <br />conditional use permit into a de facto denial. Due to the size and <br />shape of Pit 29, there is"no place within Pit 29 that is 1,000 feet <br />from all existing property lines. <br />III. THE HOARD OF ADJIIBTMENT IS THE PROPER FORIIli <br />FOR BRANNAN'B REQIIEBT <br />Appeals to the Board of Adjustment may be taken by any person <br />aggrieved by "the decision of any administrative officer or agency <br />based upon or made in the course of administration or enforcement <br /> <br />