Laserfiche WebLink
<br />of the provisions of the zoning resolution." C.R.S. §30-28- <br />118(1)(a). This statutory provision has been codified in the Adams <br />County Zoning Regulations at § 7.540 which states: <br />In addition, the Board shall act as an appeal body to any <br />administrative decision of administrative County <br />officials in enforcement of these Regulations. The Board <br />may, so long as such action is in conformity with the <br />terms of these Regulations, reverse or affirm wholly or <br />partly, or may modify the order, decision, requirement, <br />or determination as ought to be made, and to that end <br />shall have powers of the administrative official from <br />whom the appeal is taken. <br />The administrative decision that is being appealed is the <br />decision of the Planning and Development Director (an <br />administrative County official) with regard to Condition No. 6 of <br />Brannan's conditional use permit. That conditional use permit is <br />apart of and incorporated into the Zoning Regulations by virtue of <br />§ 6.200 (conditional use approvals are designated a "C" on the zone <br />map) and § 3.110 (zone maps are incorporated into the Zoning <br />Regulations). And finally, the Planning and Development Director <br />has stated that he intends to enforce the Zoning Regulations by <br />enforcing his interpretation of Condition No. 6 of Brannan's <br />conditional use permit. <br />IV. THB PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'8 INTERPRETAT] <br />OF CONDITION NO. 6 OF BRANNAN'8 CONDITIONAL II8E PERMIT <br />MIIBT SE MODIFIED TO EN8IIR8 THAT THE BOCC'8 EBPRE88 <br />INTENTION TO GRANT THE PERMIT I8 HONORED <br />As a starting point, it must be assumed that the BOCC intended <br />to approve Brannan's conditional use request. The BOCC's letter to <br />Brannan plainly-states that Brannan's request to operate an asphalt <br />plant on a five acre parcel within Pit 29 is "GRANTED, in <br />I~TWY1I~Mp6i.1 <br />