Laserfiche WebLink
i <br />At about the same time, the Planning Director submitted his <br />memorandum to the BOCC explaining the conditional use request and <br />the Planning Commission's recommendation. In this memorandum, the <br />sixth condition is typed to reflect what the Planning Commission <br />voted on (i.e., 1000 feet from Mrs. Allen's place). The word <br />"place" is, however, stricken and the word "property" substituted <br />for it. See Exhibit G. <br />On June 21, 1982, the BOCC heard Brannan's conditional use <br />request. Mr. Stratton, Mr. Heinz, and a Norman Einspahr <br />(presumably a relative of Mrs. Einspahr) apparently spoke at the <br />hearing but none of them indicated (on the sign-in sheet) whether <br />they were for or against Brannan's conditional use request. See <br />Exhibit H. Presumably, they reiterated the concerns that had been <br />raised at the Planning Commission meeting--duties of Adams County <br />in these matters, general objections to asphalt plants, and prairie <br />dogs and odor. The other two individuals at the BOCC hearing who <br />were concerned about Brannan's conditional use <br />request--Mrs. Worthing and Mrs. Allen--neither indicated a desire <br />to speak, nor did they indicate whether they were for or against <br />the request. Id. Thus, it would appear that no new issues were <br />raised at the BOCC hearing. No new objectors were present at the <br />BOCC hearing to request a buffer area similar to the one that the <br />Planning Commission had recommended to protect Mrs. Allen's <br />property. <br />On the basis of this input, the BOCC granted Brannan's <br />conditional use request. In a letter to Brannan, the Chairman of <br /> <br />