GENERAL38587 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-6- f) Map 13 - The drainage basin designations on map 13 (A and B) do not match the designations on map 9. It would be more consistent to have these designations the same. In addition, WFC should perform afield check to assure that all culvert sizes and ditch locations are accurately represented. The map should be modified to reflect field conditions as necessary. In addition, the refuse area (when approved) and storage areas should be marked on the map. The mine water collection pond at the Purgatoire River should be shown in more detail. g) Map 14 - This map shows the coal processing waste pile design. As stated earlier, construction of this pile has not been approved. This map should be retained only if an acceptable plan (in the form of a technical revision) is submitted by WFC. h) Maps 15 and 16 - The post-mining topography maps must be modified to reflect the permitting decision that the portal depression must be backfilled. V. Bond The Division has reviewed the bond for the Golden Eagle mine and found that the site is adequately bonded. The bond documents are properly executed and are in compliance with Rule 3.02.4. VI. Revision and Commitments The following is a list of items which should be incorporated into the document as revised pages. Maxwell Mine TROI -Purgatoire River Bridge (Was this ever implemented?) TR02 - Hydrology Monitoring Reduction MR02 - Expansion of Refuse Pile MR03 - Pond 002 A and B Construction MR04 - Purgatoire River Culvert Maintenance Permit Stipulations 1-29 Preliminary Adequacy and Draft Findings Responses VII. Stiaulation Status The following section describes remaining issues which need to be addressed to satisfy outstanding stipulations. All data and commitments represented by the 29 stipulations should be incorporated into the permit as revised pages.