Laserfiche WebLink
-29- <br />Response to Citizen Concerns Received <br />During the Review <br />This section identifies the comments, concerns, and issues which have been <br />raised to date through public comment on this Permit Revision Application and <br />the Divisions response. <br />Letter from Greg McKennis to the Division, dated April 25, 1990 <br />The lease application was denied by the Glenwood Springs City Council and <br />the lands involved were withdawn from the Permit Revision application as <br />of August 6. <br />Liohtino. noise levels and visual impacts are not addressed. <br />It was explained that these issues are not under MLRO's jurisdiction. <br />Generally, regulation of lighting, noise and visual impacts is the <br />responsibility of local and county government. <br />Description of redepositing of the waste was cursory and inadequate. <br />This plan was addressed extensively in the Division's initial adequacy <br />letter, dated April 27, and in subsequent correspondence. The <br />underground waste disposal plan is specifically not being approved at <br />this time. <br />This comment was incorporated into the Division's initial adequacy <br />letter, and the information has been provided by the applicant. <br />Discrepancy in cut and fill volumes. , <br />The amount of topsoil in storage accounts for the discrepancy of 42,500 <br />cubic yards. <br />Location of pumping equipment. <br />The location of pumping equipment was incorporated intg initial adequacy <br />letter. <br />More detailed information on escaoewavs. <br />These locations are shown on Figures 4.3-3. <br />