Laserfiche WebLink
to <br />to be used as topdressiug or to be replaced within the upper two feet of reclamation <br />backfill. The plan should specify that such analyses will be provided to the Division <br />and Division approval will be obtained prior to use of the material as £mal reclamation <br />plant growth medium. <br />4. There is conflicting information in various sections of text and maps, regazding small azea <br />exemption sediment control measures. The currently approved measures for Office Area, <br />Topsoil Stockpile, and Construction Material Stockpile small azea exemptions are described <br />and documented in Appendix M. The plan requires that runoff from each of these small <br />disturbed areas be routed through a segment of silt fence, The following discrepancies need <br />to be rectified: <br />a) Figure 2.2-3 (Surface Water Control Systems) indicates a silt fence at the office azea that <br />is located approximately 80 feet to the southwest of the actual silt fence location, and well <br />outside of the actual disturbed azea. Please amend the figure to depict the actual location <br />of the silt fence installation. <br />b) Figure 2.2-2 (Surface Facilities) depicts sediment traps at the three small area exemption <br />locations, rather than silt fences that are currently required and installed. Two such sediment <br />traps aze indicated for the office azea, although the approved plan requires only a single silt <br />fence installation. Also, the map appeazs to show a row of cottonwood and juniper trees <br />along the west edge of the office azea (evidently a landscaping feature) that is not present at <br />the site. Please amend the figure to accurately depict the approved plan and existing <br />site conditions. <br />c) There is outdated reference to sediment traps on pages 2-29, 2-34, 2-39. The text should <br />be appropriately amended. <br />5. Please depict the short road segments to the topsoil and construction material stockpiles <br />on Figure 2.2-2, and include appropriate narrative description and categorization for <br />these roads and the sediment pond maintenance road (e.g. "light use roadsy) in the <br />permit narrative. <br />6. Figures 2.2-2 and 2.2-3 and associated permit narrative on pages 2-32 and 2-33 depict and <br />describe two additional haul road segments that were approved many yeazs ago, but were <br />never constructed. One segment is a modification of the existing haul road to eliminate the <br />curve between Highway 139 and East Salt Creek. The other segment is an additional haul <br />road ("McClane to Munger Road° ), that would tie into the existing road immediately west <br />of the pond and stockpiles, and provide access to the "Central Facilities Area', which was <br />at one time approved under the Munger Canyon Mine permit. Because the "Central <br />Facilities Area is no longer approved, there would seem to be no remaining need for the <br />McClane to Munger Road. We have the following questions and requests. <br />10 <br />