Laserfiche WebLink
ENVIRONM1fGNT. 1NC. • • PACE 2 <br />January S, /994 <br />very little affect on the overall numbers but it is <br />important to have the analysis correct. <br />• You were correct in some respects. As I worked thru the <br />growth period analysis I found TR-21 Table 3, pp 13 to be <br />very helpful. The growing season for corn in my original <br />calculations exceeded 140 day which is consistent with <br />the reference material and information shown in TR-21, <br />table 3; so I calculated the day when the mean tempera- <br />ture was 55° and added 140 days to find the growing <br />season for the corn. Review of Exhibit C1 will show <br />this. The growing season for Pasture Grasses run from <br />45° mean temp in the spring to 45° mean temp. in the fall <br />and Exhibit B1 was changed to reflect this. The alfalfa <br />in the only one that give me any problem. Review of the <br />Climatological data showed the 20 year historical minimum <br />for November was 32.4° this is above the TR-21 Table 3 <br />number of 28° frost when alfalfa quits using water. That <br />meant the first hard frost did not occur until some time <br />in December, so I calculated the day when the mean <br />average temperature was 28° and used that as the end of <br />the growth period even thought the text in TR-21 indicat- <br />ed growth still occurred after the first freeze. These <br />periods appear to be consistent with what local ranchers <br />tell us and all Tables and Blaney-Griddle calculation <br />exhibits were revised accordingly. <br />• Rather than discuss theories, I have used your suggestion <br />to use Table 6 to calculate the effective precipitation. <br />The last table for each exhibit was re-arranged to use <br />the formulas at the bottom of TR-21, Table 6 to find the <br />effective precipitation. As for my using the 12 inches <br />per year, it think you wee confused by the numbers in the <br />column that were not part of the growth period. If, on <br />the alfalfa exhibit, you add the volumes in the bolded <br />area you get 9.15 inches for that period. TO avoid the <br />confusion this time I have placed zeros in the tables so <br />you can see we are only using the precipitation amounts <br />during the growing period. In the end the difference was <br />.very little between these numbers and the ones submitted <br />this time. <br />• I am still accumulating data to be able to do the water <br />budget analysis you requested. As soon as I have it I <br />will send you this part of the request. <br />• I have no problem with this statement but we have not <br />done this since we only planned to divert the evaporative <br />losses thru the ditch and allow the return flows to <br />remain in the river. It is my understanding that if the <br />site is within 300 feet of the river a timing analysis is <br />