Laserfiche WebLink
Richard D. Lamm <br />Governor <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />DaviO H. Getches, Executive Director <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DI\ <br />DAVID C. SHELTO N, Director <br />DATE: October 15, 1985 <br />T0: Steve Renner <br />FROM: Jim Pendleton <br />RE: Peabody Coal mpa s Response to Seneca II-W Draft Stipulation No. 12 <br />(Permit N C- 57) <br />In response to your request I have reviewed the submittal made by Peabody Coal <br />Company in response to Stipulation No. 12, included in your proposed Findings <br />for Seneca II-W application. I forward the following comments for your <br />consideration. <br />Stipulation No. 12 required that Peabody Coal Company "demonstrate that <br />blasting operations within 500 feet of the oil well will not damage the <br />integrity of the well casing and detail the safety precautions which will be <br />utilized to insure that vented gas is not ignited". The company proposes in <br />its response to "contact the owner of the well to see what limits of vibration <br />casing will withstand". Until that demonstration has been completed, it is <br />impossible to determine whether compliance with the standard loading <br />limitations of the scaled distance equation W=(D/60) will suffice. <br />Therefore, the operator statement of intent to comply with the regulations <br />does not satisfy the Division's concern expressed in original Stipulation <br />No. 12. <br />Further, the company proposes to take steps to control sparks and other <br />sources of ignition, which should definitly reduce the hazard of vented gas <br />ignition. However, I believe it would also be appropriate to determine what <br />level of vented gas actually exists prior to blasting. It should not be <br />difficult to monitor the area of the proposed blast with an appropriate <br />hydrocarbon sniffer prior to detonation. I do not believe that the operator's <br />response in this regard is sufficient to satisfy the Division's concerns. <br />For both the above reasons, I believe the company's response to be inadequate <br />to satisfy the Division's concerns regarding the detonation of explosives <br />within 500 feet of a petroleum or gas producing well. Therefore, I recommend <br />that Stipulation No. 12 be retained as originally drafted. <br />/ph <br />cc: Mike Savage <br />Doc. No. 4144 <br />423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />