Laserfiche WebLink
activities proposed in PR-06. As required and explained in Section 2.03.6(1) of the <br />regulations, please provide a description of the legal right-to-enter documents that pertain <br />to the activities proposed in PR-06. <br />Surface Water Hydroloey <br />22. The Division used version 6.21 of STORM and could not duplicate the depth and velocity <br />values that aze presented in the "V- Ditch Design" table on proposed page Exh-8-29iii for <br />the proposed loadout ditches. As an example, for ditch i3, the depth in feet for the 2 <br />percent grade was calculated by the Division as being 0.38 feet, as opposed to the table <br />value of 0.74 feet. For the same ditch and grade, the Division's value for the velocity was <br />2.04 feet per second, as opposed to the table value of 3.2 feet per second. Please review <br />the table values and revise, if appropriate. Also, revise the ditch depth values that aze <br />listed on Map No. 22-J, "Pond J Detail". <br />23. Some of the ditches at the proposed loadout have a design water flow velocity of greater <br />than 6.0 feet per second and would require erosion protection. Please revise the V-Ditch <br />design table on proposed page Exh-8-29iii to add the appropriate footnotes that refer to <br />erosion protection measures. <br />24. There does not appeaz to be a note for the ditch design tables that states that the ditch <br />designs do not include the 0.3 feet of freeboazd. Please add such a note or point out where <br />[he note is located. <br />25. In previous hydrology submittals, BRL did not submit the ditch design data sheets. The <br />Division accepted this in the past. However, it would probably be a good idea to submit <br />these design data sheets for each ditch. Please comment. <br />26. As had been discussed in the meeting on Friday, October 5 at the Division, please provide <br />designs for the concrete ditch that is intended to replace culvert C-J2. If the culvert will <br />not be replaced by the ditch, please provide hydrology designs for the culvert and a <br />schematic for the culvert risers. <br />27. As had been discussed in the meeting on Friday, October 5 at the Division, please provide <br />designs for the railroad track SAES. <br />28. Please add the green cross-hatch SAE designation for the railroad track SAES on Map 20. <br />29. Please relabel the ditch table as Ditch-Hl, instead of Ditch-H2, on proposed page Exh-8- <br />170. <br />30. On proposed page Exh-8-170, in ditch table Ditch-H2, it is stated that there is additional <br />