My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV106102
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV106102
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:20:47 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 1:31:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977436
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
9/25/2000
Doc Name
TOWER PIT 1 FN M-1977-436 OPERATED BY CAMAS COLO INC
From
BANKS AND GESSO LLC
To
DWR
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Sent By: TUTTLE APPLEOATE INC U; 30345227593034526611;Sep-25-00 10:38; Pege 3 <br />Mr. Bill Mc%tyre <br />-• Sepleerbald,T000 <br />Pege d rjS <br />Evapo-atlve Lossu <br />During mining, groundwater will be exposed in a dowatering trench, a collection basin and <br />settling ponds. The total exposed ground water surface area due to mining is approximate]y 3.U <br />acres. <br />The NOAH Technical Report NWS 33, Evaporation Atlas for the ontiguous 481Jnited States <br />(U.S. Department of Commerce) was used to determine gross evaporation. For this locatioq the <br />annual cvaporplion was estimated at 43.0 inches. Monthly evaporation percentages, as suggested <br />by the Office of the State Engineer for elevations below 6.500 feet. were used to calculate <br />monthly evaporation. <br />The Colorado Climate Crater monttily clunatic date for Brighton, station 50950, was used to <br />estimate precipitation. Effective monthly ptt:cipilation was assumed to be 7(1% of uveragc <br />monthly ptecipimtion. <br />Evaporative losses are detailed in Tahlo-l . Net evaporation is difference between gross <br />evaporation and effective precipitation. The total evaporative loss is the product of net <br />_, evaportion and the total exposed ground water surface. Tho annual evaporative loss is 8.2U <br />acrwfeet <br />Operations! Lossrs <br />Operational losses are detailed in Table-2. The moistum content of the material hauled off the <br />site was assumed to be 4 percent by weight The ermual amount of mined product for the pit is <br />estimated at 700,000 tons. This tesult+ in an annual amount of 20.60 acre-feet of watcT retained <br />in Ute product. Since the thine is producing yeu round, dust control is requited during all <br />months. Production rates are highest dttriag the months ofMay-September, and, in combination <br />witt- the weathor, this period requires the greatest amount of dust control. The annual amount of <br />water use For dust control is estimated at 2.0 acre-feat, and use is diroctly related to production <br />rates. Thercforc, total annual operational losses of 22.60 aae-feu are prorated throughout the <br />year based on production rates. <br />Projected stnearre depietlons <br />Since the site is more than Il2fl feet from the South Platte River, the total consumptive uses were <br />pot assumed to be inatautaneow depktiona in the river. A stream depletion modal utilizing a <br />stream depletion factor (SDF) of 10 days was completed for the Hammer Pit to determine the <br />lagged effect of the consumptive uses. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.