My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV100875
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV100875
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:11:22 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:40:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981039
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/12/1993
Doc Name
GRASSEY GAP MINE ROCKCASTLE COAL CO PN C-81039
From
R H PECK PC
To
PARCEL MAURO HULTIN & SPAANSTRA PC
Type & Sequence
SL1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /><' <br />r, <br />/' <br />R. H. PECK, P.G. <br />Mr. Dean R. Massey <br />Re: Permit No. C-81039 <br />February 10, 1993 <br />Page 2 <br />As I understand the matter, Although our discussions have talked about <br />the fact that the $25,000.00 is being forfeited to the State of <br />Colorado, according to Kent Gorham this is not really the case and, in <br />the end, if any funds remain and after all work is done, whatever is <br />left will be remitted to your client. <br />The above proposal would afford my client the maximum protection it <br />could have at this time and would not involve your client in the <br />administrative process of determining these disbursements. <br />On the other hand, my client is perfectly willing to wait and handle <br />this in the normal administrative manner. This would mean that just as <br />soon as the snow was off the property and it could be reasonably <br />inspected (hopefully sometime in early May), all parties would have an <br />opportunity to look over the situation and attempt to reach a <br />determination or agreement as to how much weed spraying needed to be <br />done and who should bear the cost for it. Thereafter, that process <br />could continue until my client Eelt itself sufficiently in control of <br />the situation that any remaining amounts could be quantified with some <br />degree of comfort. <br />Concerning the dissemination of these weeds across the property, my <br />client believes: <br />1. That had an appropriate weed control plan been involved in the <br />reclamation process, these weeds would have been controled for <br />relatively little cost right where they first appeared. <br />2. That while these types of weeds appear fairly generally across the <br />subject property, their origin was clearly in the disturbed areas <br />and therefore are the responsibility of the operator. <br />3. That it will take a concerted effort over a period of four to five <br />years to gain full control of these weeds. <br />It is indeed true that there is no place you can go in Northwestern <br />Colorado on a sheep ranch and not find some weeds, but the amount of <br />the weeds in this area is dramatic and vastly different from what is <br />observed on the rest of the ranch. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.