Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />The property is not zoned Industrial but residential, so therefore, all the information for the <br />Reclamation Plan is wrong, according to your (DMG) requirements. (Kenneth and Beverly <br />Coggins) <br />This issue relates to Exhibit E of the application <br />DIVISION RATIONALE -ITEMS N0.4 <br />The applicant changed the application final land use to Residential. Because this changed a <br />requirement of the public notice, the applicant was required to re-notice the general public and all <br />others required to be noticed. The applicant made appropriate changes to the reclamation plan. The <br />plan meets the performance standazds of Rule 3.1 <br />5. Hard Rock has not addressed the 4 homes that are within the 190-foot limit and the effect <br />of the pit operations on the homes. (Kenneth and Beverly Coggins) <br />6. The permit states that there are a few homes in the area. There are actually ] 80 residents <br />within a one block radius of the gravel pit property. (Kenneth and Beverly Coggins) <br />These issues relate to Exhibit S of the application <br />DIVISION RATIONALE - ITEM5 5 and 6 <br />The applicant has complied with regulation requirements to identify structures within 200 feet of <br />affected land and to notify all landowners within 200 feet of the affected land boundary. The <br />only home the applicandoperator identified to be within 200 feet of affected land belongs to Mr. <br />John Koehler. Mr. Koehler has not objected to the application in regazd to potential for damage <br />to his home. In accordance with Rule 6.4.19, the applicant had an engineering evaluation <br />completed that demonstrates that structures will not be damaged by activities occurring at the <br />mining operation. The report specifically states that, "The gravel mining operations, as outlined <br />in the 112 conversion application, will not result in damage to Union Pacific Railroad Facilities <br />or to the Koehler Property adjacent to the Buena Vista Pit." The report was signed by a <br />registered professional engineer. <br />7. Where will the water to wash the dust in the crusher come from? And, where will it go <br />after being used in the crusher? (Kenneth and Beverly Coggins) <br />These issues relate to Exhibit G of the application <br />DIVISION RATIONALE -ITEM N0.7 <br />The applicant did not identify a source of water for dust control and states that the only water <br />source on the site, the well in the middle of the proposed permit azea, will not be used in the <br />operation. <br />The applicant's plan to control fugitive dust is under [he jurisdiction of the Air Quality Control <br />Division of the Colorado Department of Health and the Environment. <br />4- <br />