My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV100508
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV100508
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:10:59 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:36:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977196
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/24/1999
Doc Name
HARD ROCK PAVING & REDI-MIX INC BUENA VISTA PIT PN M-77-196 CONVERSION APPLICATION PRE HEARING CONFE
From
DMG
To
DICK & MARGE ALLEN
Type & Sequence
CN1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />The Division received comments and objections from the following individuals at the August 27, 1999 <br />Informal Conference or within 5 days of the Conference. <br />Objector Status Dated Received <br />~:,"1J,~ww Parr mf <br />Richard and Susan Wolfe (parties) tZ I' 8!30199 9/1199 <br />Kenneth and Beverly Goggins (parties) 8/27/99 8/27/99 <br />The Division received an objection from the following individuals after the first required public comment <br />period ended and prior to the start of the second required comment period. The Division decided to allow <br />the comments as being timely filed. <br />Objector Status Dated Received <br />Mazge and Dick Allen (parties) 8/19/99 8/23/99 <br />Below are lists of issues received during the statutory comment periods from persons objecting to the <br />application. Following the issue is the name(s) of the objector(s) submitting the objection and the <br />application exhibit it applies to. Following the issues that aze within the jurisdiction of the Boazd and <br />Division is a discussion of the Division's Rationale for recommending approval of the application over the <br />objection. <br />Issues the Division Believes Are not Within the Jurisdiction of Colorado Mined Land <br />Reclamation Board and the Division <br />The gravel pit is zoned rural residential with a grandfather variance. The property is <br />surrounded by residential property. The proposed final land use is Industrial/Commercial. - <br />Local Government Jurisdiction <br />2. The gravel pit has not been in operation for two years and only operated a few days at a time for <br />years before that. -Local Govemment Jurisdiction <br />3. Dust, dirt, and fumes from the operation of this pit would be very detrimental to the health of <br />elderly people living within one block of the property. They cannot afford to move away. - <br />Colorado Deaartment of Health and Environment and Local Government Jurisdiction <br />4. We feel the best and highest use of this land (mine site) would be for residential. -Local <br />Government Jurisdiction <br />5. Hard Rock Paving and Redi-Mix, Inc., has stated that the property is zoned industrial. This is <br />wrong. They are zoned rural residential with a grandfather in special permit. We aze protesting <br />the application by Hard Rock to have their quarry pit area re-zoned to construct and operate an <br />asphalt and concrete processing plant. -Local Govemment Jurisdiction <br />6. Increased heavy equipment traffic and safety hazard. -Local Government Jurisdiction <br />Increased noise pollution. -Local Government Jurisdiction <br />-2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.