Laserfiche WebLink
12. Page 2.05-5 "Lorencito Canyon Mine" should be Jeff Canyon. Surface mining sequence needs better <br />description, especially concerning [he contour operation. <br />Page 2.05-5 has been revised to reference "Jeff Canyon Mine". <br />/3. Are figures 2.05.3-1 to 2.05.3-4 still accurate regarding mining sequence? <br />Figures 2.05.3-1 to 2.05.3-4 are representative of area mining that will be practiced in portions of the <br />Jeff Canyon Mine. <br />14. Page 2.05-10 should state sediment structures are built in "advance of bush removal" <br />Page 2.05-10 has been revised to state that sediment structures are built in advance of brush removal. <br />I5. Page 2.05-13a speaks to haul roads but does not mention Map 2.05.3-3. Is this correct? <br />Map 2.05-3 shows the Lorencito and Jeff Canyon Haul Road. Text has been amended on page 2.05- <br />13a. <br />16. /s map 2.05-3b still valid? Ifso is it a figure or a map? Please check haul road map references in all <br />[ext. <br />Map 2.05-3 presents the haul road plan for the Jeff Canyon Mine and Map 2.05-3a represents the <br />overall haul road plan for Jeff Canyon and Lorencito Canyon Mines. Maps 2.05-3c, and 2.05-3d <br />present the Haul Road plan lay-out and profiles for the three individual segments of Haul Roads <br />proposed to service the Lorencito Canyon Mine. <br />Map 2.05-3b is obsolete and should be removed from the permit. Page 2.05-13a has been revised to <br />clarify [he Haul Road Maps and Figures. Pages 2.05-11a and 2.05-12 are blank and should be <br />removed from the permit. Page 2.05-13 has been revised and repagina[ed as 2.05-12. <br />References to haul road maps and figures have been clarified on this page. <br />Figures 2.05-3a and 2.05-3b represents the as constmcted lay-out and profile of the Lorencito and Jeff <br />Canyon haul roads respectively and should be placed with the "as-built" certifications for these haul <br />roads.. <br />17. /f roads will remain as permanent, elephant trunks or conveyor belts would not be acceptable for <br />channel lining. Please correct as necessary. (Page 2.05-23). <br />Page 2.05-23 has been revised to clarify that these materials will not be used on roads remaining after <br />final reclamation. <br />1 S. Page 2.05-26 excludes the last paragraph and does not~low to the next page. <br />I have been unable to located a copy of page 2.05-26 with an approval date of 7/25/01 that has text <br />that flows to the next page of text. Can the Division supply a copy? <br />19. Page 29c, the roads are incorrectly identified <br />Figure 2.05-15 on page 2.05-29c has been updated by Figure 2.05-15 on page 2.05-31 submitted <br />December 2002. Page 2.05-29c has been revised as a intentionally blank page to replace the <br />outdated figure on 2.05-29c. <br />Z0. On Page 2.05-30, the Loadout is mentioned Is it still planned for use? <br />3 of 5 <br />