|
C:UHB\C82056\RN03\011400adq.doc 9 01/14/00
<br />6~. This item is being addressed in TR-32.
<br />66.e) Item 66(a) of DMG's March 2, 1998 adequacy letter was inadvertently re-designated as Item
<br />66(e) in DN1G's September 10, 1999 adequacy letter. This item has been adequately addressed
<br />with revised page 2.03-22 submitted November 16, 1999.
<br />66.g) Item 66(g) of DMG's March 2, 1998 adequacy letter was inadvertently re-designated as Item
<br />66(k) in DMG's September 10, 1999 adequacy letter. This item remains partially unresolved.
<br />Regarding the description of NOV C-97-O1 l on replacement page 2.03-22? (dated 11(1/99), a
<br />new sentence reads, "Twentymile Coal Company requested an assessment conference on
<br />September 24, 1997 and a civil penalty of $6500 was proposed based on the infotmation
<br />presented during that conference." Please delete "... and a civil penalty of $6500 was proposed
<br />based on the information presented during that conference" from this sentence, and place a period
<br />after "...September 24, 1997".
<br />67.a) Item 67(a) of DMG's March 2, 1998 adequacy letter, and of DMG's September 10, 1999
<br />adequacy letter, has been adequately addressed with Twentymile Coal Company revised page
<br />2.03-25 and 2.03-25.1.
<br />67.b) Item 67(b) of DMG's March 2, 1998 adequacy letter, and of DMG's September 10, 1999
<br />adequacy letter, has been adequately addressed with Twentymile Coal Company submittal of
<br />revised page 2.03-25 and 2.03-25.1 (rev. 11/1/99).
<br />67.f) Item 67(f) of DMG's March 2, 1998 adequacy letter, and of DMG's September 10, 1999
<br />adequacy letter, has been adequately addressed.
<br />67.g) Item 67(g) of DMG's March 2, 1998 adequacy letter originally stated:
<br />"On permit page 2.03-18, under '(10) Mining Lease', it is stated that TCC has a lease from Rocky
<br />Mountain Fuel Company to mine in 'all' ofSection 19, TSN, R85W. However, Map 2 indicates
<br />that the majority of the coal in Section 19, TSN, R85W is federal. Please address. "
<br />After reviewing TCC's response to this question, the following two questions were asked under
<br />Item No. 14 in DMG's February 25, 1999 intemal memo from Dan Herrtartdez to Janet Binns
<br />(this internal memo was referenced in Item No. 67(g) of DMG's September 10, 1999 adequacy
<br />letter):
<br />"Item 67(g) remains partially unresolved. On proposed permit page 2.03-18, the
<br />description of the Rocky Mountain Fuel Company lease has been revised in Section 19, TSN,
<br />R8.iW, to read :41! that part of Tract 138, and all that part of Tract lying in the NW '/, NW'/+.
<br />Should another tract number follow the second 'Tract' in this sentence? "
<br />"Map 2, Coal Uvnership "indicates currently that the Rocky Aountain Fue! Company lease in
<br />Section /9, TSN, R85W is situated in the NE'/, of the NW'/, ojthe section, not in the NW '/, of the
<br />NW %, as described in proposed permit page 1.03-28. Does Map 2 need to be corrected? "
<br />
|