REV96330 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

^ Mr. Joe Dudash, CDMG Re: TR-76 Second Response Page 2 Response to Comment 27 The Section 5.0 page in question (enclosed) was revised to correctly indicate 80 existing topsoil stockpiles and six new stockpiles as of December 31, 1996. Table 5-3, page 3 (enclosed), was revised to accurately reflect 186.6 total acres of topsoil stockpile disturbance as of December 31, 1996. Response to Comment 35 The water level plots in Appendix A of the Annual Report use data from baseline to present. Some of the eazly data for wells with greater than 20 years of recorded data may have to be dropped in the future from the plots in order to enable the current year changes to be better presented. If Trapper proposes the shorter time span to be used on plots, the historical data will be referenced in earlier plots. The plow in Appendix B for the ground-water quality also use historical through present data. It may also become advantageous in the future to present a shorter period of time for some wells in order to adequately portray the changes that have occurred in the most recent yeaz. The TSS and wnductivity versus time plots present historical through present data. The flow versus TSS plow have presented only the recent years data. Historical data will be added to these plots in the future with a different symbol being used for the current year information. This will also be done for the flow versus conductivity plots. Response to Comment 36 Flow versus time graphs will be developed for all of the NPDES sites in the 1997 annual report. Response to Comment 37 The surface water tables in Appendix C will present a "0" for zero flow periods as in the 1996 annual report. Please contact me or Karl Koehler of my staff if you have any further questions or concerns. Sincerely, ~ ".~7 Forrest Luke Environmental Manager FVL J7R76RE52.docJ Encl c File 109.2.3.4, w/enc Revisions notebook, w/mc