My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV96188
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV96188
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:20:57 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:56:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981014
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/19/2002
Doc Name
Objection Letters & Request for Conference
From
Paula Coulter
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
SL2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
November 15, 2002 <br />the Parties, regarding this iswe. h is a point of contention, which has far-reaching <br />consequences and potential devastation. <br />Waste Disposal <br />At our request Grosvenor Engineering Comparry did an independent engineering <br />report on December 27, 2000. As part of their inspection they looked at the waste <br />disposal area on the Vento tract. They found that since the most recent Vento <br />agreement at the time, the mine had disturbed an addttional 1.3 atxes for waste <br />disposal. An equivalent area was also recaimed. <br />• We are requesting your inspection report on the total waste disposal <br />disturbance to date and the amount that is in excess of the most recent <br />agreement. <br />Soil and Water Tests <br />• We reque~ a responseJreport relaating to any water and soil tests that <br />you have conducted fi particularty prorre areas indudir~ the fdlowing: <br />Fuel Tank Area, Explosives Bunker, Waste Disposal Area, Wells, <br />Tailings Pile and Ponds 1-4. <br />The Phase 1 Bond Release should not be granted until these reports are sulunitted <br />antl meet acceptable standards and compliance. <br />Drainage and Gretles <br />• We request your inspection reports detailing drainage and grade with <br />respect to Ponds 3 and 4, the Borrwv Area, Refuse Pile and acrxss <br />roads. <br />The Bonow Area acrd Ponds 3 and 4 are of particular cencem. Grades acrd drainage <br />appear to be nort~cempiiant. We are requesting that Ports 4 be left for our use <br />particulady now that tt appears there are not enough soil reserves to adequately fill in <br />Ponds3 or4. <br />6. Borrow Area/1 ~ Year Ditch <br />tt appears that within the borrows Area that EFCI has seeped off and exfrected soils <br />far beyond the original agreement in order to fulfill topsoil requirements in disturbed <br />areas. They obviously did not stockpile enough topsoiVsubsoil reserves to meet <br />requirements arW are util'rzlrt9 our previously undisturbed land to fulfill their needs. <br />The grade and ouislope of the Borrnws Area is inadequate. <br />The extensive disturbance of the Bonows Area arW devebpment of the 100 year <br />d8ch has eliminated the longing track for vehicles to access areas near Ponds 3 <br />and 4. We would like that access put bads in place. <br />• We request your inspection reports on the amounts taken from the Borrow Area <br />as they relate to the latest disturbance agreement as well as your determinations <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.