Laserfiche WebLink
<br />5. There are fences shown on the application maps that adjoin the perimeter fences of the <br />proposed site and appear to belong to adjacent landowners. On the map, please identify the <br />owners of all these fences, and any other structures on or within 200 feet of the proposed <br />affected area. Other structures that appear to be on or within 200 feet of the proposed <br />affected area, but are not listed, and who's owners are not identified on the map, are the <br />irrigation ditches, buildings, and the wells mentioned in Exhibit S. Please be sure that each <br />individual structure, and it's owner are shown on this map. <br />Exhibit C -Minino Plan Mao <br />6. Please show details of the proposed sediment pond on this map. Placement of a pit with high <br />vertical walls, near the County Road by Phase 3 -part A, is not recommended. <br />7. Please show the proposed locations for the topsoil and overburden stockpiles, and the <br />direction of mining, for each of the proposed phases. <br />Exhibit D -Minino Plan <br />8. The approved mining plan specifies a gravel thickness of 10-15 feet and an average <br />overburden thickness of 4 feet. Does this description apply to the new areas? It appears that <br />the current Phase 2 highwall is much taller than these thickness ranges indicate. <br />9. It is recommended that the pit slopes for each phase be reclaimed with irregular shorelines and <br />varying slope grades (in compliance with rule 3) to provide improved wildlife habitat and <br />aesthetics. <br />Exhibit E -Reclamation Plan <br />10. Please indicate if highwalls will be reduced to final grade by total backfilling, by cut and fill <br />methods, or by mining the final slope at the approved final grade. If backfil{ is to be <br />conducted, please provide details of the process, including where the material for backfilling <br />will be stockpiled and what the material.consists of. <br />11.Because of the aggressive nature of Russian olive trees along river corridors and lake shores, <br />the Division recommends that Whitewater use this amendment application to replace the <br />Russian olive (to be planted around the existing permit area) with other species of shrubs and <br />trees that are native to the area and benefit wildlife. <br />12.The use of three different mining and reclamation plan documents, with three different sets of <br />maps, is very confusing, especially when cross-referencing to identify which requirements are <br />active and which have been modified or deleted. Please consider combining these plans and <br />maps into one document, and one set of maps. <br />13.The reclamation plan for the Stage 3 - Part A settling pond indicates that this area will he left <br />to revegetate itself. This plan is acceptable, but it must include a provision for revegetation if <br />natural vegetation establishment doesn't work. The Division recommends a plan to revegetate <br />the area if natural revegetation has not become well established within two years after the <br />settling pond is taken out of service. <br />