My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV94688
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV94688
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:20:01 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:42:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988044
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/12/1996
Doc Name
TECHNICAL ADEQUACY REVIEW OF AMENDMENT APPLICATION FOR 112 PN M-88-044 COAL CREEK RESOURCES
From
DMG
To
TRIAD WESTERN CORP
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />DMG believes that a qualitative analysis of the effects of <br />groundwater depletion are unnecessary. In the 1993 U.S. Fish and <br />Wildlife Service report, "The Response of a Mature Cottonwood <br />Riparian Community to a Gradient of Alluvial Groundwater Decline," <br />measurements taken at the Coal Creek Resources site specifically <br />demonstrated that significant negative effects on the cottonwood <br />groves can be proven when the groundwater table falls two feet <br />below the average depth. <br />Please commit to a specific course of mining changes which will be <br />implemented when the depth of the water in the monitoring wells <br />falls below this lower limit (7.5 below ground level), regardless <br />of the apparent health of the cottonwood groves. The State Land <br />Board set an upper limit of approximately 20~ mortality on the <br />existing cottonwood community when they leased the property to the <br />operator, and it is believed that waiting until negative effects <br />are detectable may increase tree mortality beyond this agreed-upon <br />limit. The in-place monitoring wells should be regarded as points <br />of compliance for groundwater quantity. DMG would also like an up- <br />to-date version of Figure D-2 with the new monitoring station <br />trans.=_ct included, and a physical scale drawn on the map. Also, DMG <br />feels that annual reports of the monitoring of the groundwater <br />stations is inadequate, and would like TWK Enterprises to suggest <br />a more frequent monitoring schedule. <br />3) DMG also wishes to inform TWK Enterprises at this time that <br />unless the necessary compensation agreements are reached with the <br />State Land Board, Public Service Co., and the Central Resources Gas <br />Company with regard to mining within 200 feet of their permanent <br />structures (roads and pipelines) DMG will only grant a conditional <br />permit. Such a permit will state that no mining can take place <br />until the legal issues and permission to mine are obtained from the <br />intercasted parties which own the structures within 200 feet of the <br />mining in writing, or an engineering study which proves that there <br />will be no negative impacts from the mining on the structures. <br />C.R.S.. 34-32.5-115-4(e) states that a permit can be denied on the <br />grounds that "the mining operation will adversely affect the <br />stability of any... permanent manmade structures located within 200 <br />feet of the affected land; except the permit shall not be denied... <br />where there is an agreement between the Operator and the persons <br />having an interest in the structure... or where such an agreement <br />can not be reached, the Applicant provides an appropriate <br />engineering evaluation that demonstrates that such structures shall <br />not be damaged by proposed.., operations." <br />4) Fie were unable to determine the nature of the strata which <br />lies under the sand and gravel to be mined from the information <br />given in the application. Please describe the nature of this layer, <br />(including the thickness of the strata) so that DMG can decide if <br />further soil amendments or topsoiling will be necessary after the <br />material overlying these strata is removed. This is in accordance <br />with Rule 6.4.4 (f)(ii) of the Construction Material Rules and <br />Regulations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.