My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV90451
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV90451
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:12:10 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:03:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977211
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/1/1994
Doc Name
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT AMENDMENT AM-01 - PIKEVIEW QUARRY PNM-77-210
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
164
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Purpose and Overview <br />• In late 1992, under the leadership of new company president Carl ("Bud") Herskind, <br />Castle began an exploratory core drilling program to determine whether the Pikeview mining <br />operation could be totally redesigned. After extensive analysis of the core samples and other field <br />work, Castle determined that the mining plan could be altered to facilitate the community desired <br />enhanced reclamation- Castle then presented its conclusions to the MRAC. Castle's proposed <br />approach to quarry operations would make mining and advanced reclamation techniques <br />increasingly compatible. In fact Castle's proposal, in lazge measure, achieves the Scaz <br />Commission goal of replacing reserves in undisturbed areas with increased mining in already <br />disturbed areas. The MRAC agreed with Castle's approach. <br />Castle's conceptual operation plan was then presented to a joint meeting of the Colorado <br />Springs City Council and El Paso Commissioners. The concepts were well received. The <br />Colorado Springs City Council and the El Paso County Commissioners each passed resolutions <br />supporting the concepts presented to them. Copies of the resolutions are included at the end of <br />this exhibit. The City Council and County Commissioners encouraged development of the actual <br />• revised plan. Revised plan design work then began- The resulting plan is presented in this <br />application. <br />The main areas in which the proposed plan modifies the existing plan are:' <br />1. Affected Land Boundary. The affected land boundary in the southwestern and <br />northwestern corners of the permit area is extensively altered to remove approximately 25 acres <br />of unaffected land that would have been affected under the existing permit. This change directly <br />addresses visual impact mitigation by leaving highly visible land unmined. <br />2. New Sequencing. New phase delineation is employed, driven by reclamation <br />concerns. The new phasing will facilitate more concurrent reclamation. <br />3. Increased Mining of Less Visible Atready Disturbed Areas. To replace reserves <br />lost through alteration of the affected land boundary, an area at the base of the main quarry back <br />wall will be deeply excavated and then backfilled with waste produced through limestone <br />processing. The reclamation topography will be very similar to that in the current plan. The net <br />• 'This revision ie intended to replace ell previous amendments end moat technical revisions for Chia <br />operation. Many baseline exhibits included in previous aubmittale have been updated to ensure that there ie o0 <br />wafusion. This plan, if approved, will bemme the reg~ilatory basis for the permit. <br />Pikeview l]uarry Amendment Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.