My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV90044
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV90044
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:11:51 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:59:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/8/1996
Doc Name
TR39 DESERADO MINE C-81-018
From
WESTERN FUELS UTAH
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
TR39
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PAGE 2 <br />JULY 8, 1996 <br />DAN MATHEWS <br />The seed mix and application rate for this is detailed in V-42. Following successful <br />establishment of channel vegetation, and prior to final reclamation, ditch segments will <br />be reevaluated to determine which segments, if any, will require additional sediment <br />or erosion control devices. The final dttch ranamanrc of RP-5 i.e. the ditches not <br />affected by final reclamation will be rip pped with graded, an ular, durable rocks. Any <br />g aver rocks from the a9p rpm ~1II'68-moved. Simda~ry~ existing aver <br />roek-theelyda - Jr9m these ditches will ke~move~ and reconstructs wi r <br />a e ro However, the interim dttches will b'e controlled for erosions as outlined <br />m 2. above. Also, the final ditch design will not apply to the western RP-5 ditch <br />collecting undisturbed area diversion since this ditch area will be a part of the future <br />refuse area 6 (RP-6). <br />4. We are proposing to use a Greenfix American WS-72 fiber blanket, or its equivalent, <br />for erosion control. See attached product specification. This blanket is 10096 <br />agricultural straw with aphoto-degradable netting on both sides and a minimum <br />weight of 0.7 Ibs/ydZ. The seed mix specified in page V-42 will be used. I have <br />amended page V-42 and V-44 of the permit as per your recommendation; Western <br />wheatgrass has now been listed as 'Rosana' instead of 'Amur", 'green needle-and- <br />thread° grass has been changed to needlegrass (stipa vindula) and the broadcast <br />seeding rate has been changed to 60 PLS per square foot. Also, the seedmix used <br />for cut and fill slopes (page V-41) will be used for the grass lined channels. <br />5. Figure IV-1 (a new figure) shows the specific design details of cobble dams. The <br />existing cobble dams in Refuse area 5 will be removed, and cooble dams will be <br />reconsfructed as per the design criteria. <br />Temporary stabilization measures to be utilized to confrol flow velocities and minimize <br />erosion have been discussed above in 2., and are included on page IV-24 of the <br />permit. The temporary stabilization structure will be monitored and evaluated after <br />each storm. Additional confrol measures will be undertaken if the existing measures <br />are found to be inadequate. WFU will continue monitoring of these structures on a <br />monthly basis once they are performing properly. The sediment deposited at the <br />check dams or frays will be cleaned out once its level exceeds one-half of the <br />consfructed capacity. The existing riprap in RP-2/3 and RP-4 will also be evaluated <br />for its effectiveness. If the riprap is not performing properly, graded angular rocks will <br />be used to replace the existing river rods. <br />6. In lieu of erosion control ditches along the face of the refuse piles, WFU proposes to <br />use land imprinting as a method to control sediment and runoff velocties. Last year <br />WFU used the sheep's foot compactor to imprint a portion of the north slope of the <br />Refuse area 2-3 pile. To date, no additional cutting or rilling has occurred in this area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.