REV89573 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

0 0 C. Agreed. When the growth medium has been used in reclamation the area will be graded and reseeded using the south facing slope seed mixture according to the procedures outlined for the entire mine area. D. The original plan called for the area to remain as parking and industrial area. However the County denied this use and requested the area be revegetated as soon as filling of the area is complete. The reclamation procedures approved for the rest of the mine will be followed. The operator will use the seed mixture approved for south facing slopes to revegetate the flat areas of the stage. The rip rapped faces will not be revegetated. E. See answer d, above. F. See answer e. above. Yes, it is part of the setback and undisturbed area. A. This notch is contoured to resemble the existing drainage. The operator does not anticipate any problems with stability of the benches in this area. A. The Division of Water Resources made no mention of concerns on this matter in a letter dated January 7, 1985. These question were not raised when Stages X and Y were approved by technical revision. Since these stages are not in question we are assuming Stages X and Y are not in question and the question is rised for Stage Z which is up for approval in this amendment. We stated in the answer for Exhibit D (A.4) that the operator would not fill directly in the river and in Exhibit E (E) that sloping would be towards the river at a rate of less than 1~. This fill will not changed the drainage pattern only slow down the runoff speed by reducing the slopes in Stage Z. B. Yes. His permit is good until completion of the project for the accell/decell lanes in Stage Y. None was necessary in Stages X and Z because no direct filling is being done in the creek. E A. Stage Z has been mined in the past. It is part of a placer claim established in the late 1800's, so disturbance was present prior to Nr. Frei widening the road. There was no soil or growth medium available to save.