REV89573 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~ o to the 7380 elevation the same as the planned sight berm the operator will better isolate the mine site. 2. This material will be compacted as it is placed. 3. The transportation corridor is 0.40 acres +/-. The secondary access corridor has been removed from the plan at the request of the Clear Creek Commissioners. 4. Not applicable for this amendment. 5. Not applicable for this amendment. 6, Mining should remove this corridor within 10 years after it is first used. C. Stage A was approved in a Technical Revision by the Board in June, 1984. Its use will be to store growth medium needed to reclaim Stage Z. Exhibit E - Reclamation Plan Questions a. thru e. are from the December 24, 1984 letter. Questions A, thru F. are from the March 27, 1985 letter. a, Not applicable for this amendment. b. Yes. From the Affected Lands (Map Exhibit C) the slopes facing U.S. 6 vary from 1.16v-lh to 1.06v-lh. The 2h-lv planned is less steep and meet MLR standards for non-water area slopes. (~.` The requested cross-section is attached. Please refer to the ~7 D-1 and F maps for the locations of the cross-sections. Note that A-A' and B-B' are current conditions from the D-1 map and A-A'1 and B-B'1 are proposed final grade fro m the F map. The approximate location of the 6" drainage pipe is shown on both the F Map and the cross-sections.. d. Drainage will be towards the creek but the slope will be very gentle, less than 18. It seems impractical to try to revegetate rip rap. Rip rap is placed to protect a slope from erosion by the creek. Placing growth medium on the rip rap would be inviting erosion problems and the final condition of the slope would not be adequate to meet the performance requirements to get the bond released. No revegetation is planned for the rip rap faces. A. Not applicable for this amendment. B. Not applicable for this amendment. 2