Laserfiche WebLink
i <br />' 212 <br /> 1 this mornin <br />was <br />arin <br />dific <br />ti <br />f the <br />r <br />h <br /> g <br />mo <br />a <br />on o <br />p <br />e <br />e <br />g <br /> 2 order that both counsel agreed to. I think now what <br /> 3 is being suggested is a further modification. So I <br /> 4 don't know. <br /> 5 I mean, I am up for having it either <br /> 6 way. It seems to me that what Dean has suggested <br /> 7 is, if they want to reserve cross-examination <br /> e further <br />that th <br />amination would <br />dditi <br />l c <br />- <br /> , <br />e a <br />ona <br />ross <br />ex <br />' 9 be on the issues presented during rebuttal. So <br />' <br /> 10 that <br />s narrowing the scope of - <br /> 11 MR. COHEN: It potentially could narrow <br /> 12 the scope of our cross-examination. It could also <br /> 13 potentially streamline these proceedings. I don't <br /> 14 think it would add time. If anything, I think it <br /> 15 would shorten the remainder of the proceedings, <br /> 16 MR. DONALD: We agree with that. <br />' <br /> 17 s proceed <br />THE CHAIRMAN: All right. Let <br />' 18 that way. <br /> 19 (Discussion off the record.) <br /> 20 UNIDENTIFIED PERSON: At least 30, plus <br /> 21 whatever we gave you this morning. <br />t 22 (Inaudible <br /> .) <br /> 23 THE CHAIRMAN: I'm sure you will be as <br /> 24 brief and precise as you can. <br /> 25 MR. MASSEY: The first issue I would <br /> AGREN, BLANDO 6 BILLINGS <br /> <br />