My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1992-04-02_REVISION - M1988112
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
1992-04-02_REVISION - M1988112
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2021 3:54:55 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:13:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/2/1992
Doc Name
PN M88-112 TR 4
From
BATTLE MOUNTAIN GOLD CO
To
MLRD
Type & Sequence
TR4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />~... ~ ... <br />Page 18 <br />Fourth, the capial costs of cyanide recovery systems are less than for ehher chem[cal ar bldogical <br />treatment facilhies. Incorporation of a cyanide recovery system Into the metallurgical circuR reduces <br />downstream cyanide and metals levels, and thereby further reduces the rapttal and operatl~g costs of <br />treatment by reducing the size of the treatment facility and the period of time treatment Is required fdlowing <br />mine closure. The economic advantages are In addftlon to the environmental advantages dlscUssed In the <br />previous section. ~ : ' <br />Examination of the proposed Gdden Cross cyanide recovery system provides an excellent a mple of the <br />economics of the process (1i). The anticipated capital cost for the Cyanisorb Process Is~bout S(NZ) <br />2,200,000. There are several direct capital cost benefits due to Incorporation d cyanide recovery. First, <br />there is no need for the bacMill wash plant which would have cost about S(NZ) 600,000. Second, there are <br />substantial reductions In downstream treatment requirements associated wRh the hydrogen peroxide <br />treatment facility. <br />The excess process water accumulating In the decant pond will be treated and discharged to A local river. <br />By incorporating cyanide recovery, there Is a significant decrease In untreated cyanide concentrations, <br />thereby decreasing chemical costs. The reduction In cyanide minimizes the ammonia formed via natural <br />attenuation and chemical treatment to such an extent that nftrification is not required. These modrfications <br />in treatment capacRy reduce the original capital cost estimate for cyanide, metals, and ammonia treatment <br />from about S(NZ) 6,300,000 to $(NZ) 3,700,000. The overall cap'rtat cost savings Is S(N 3,200,000 <br />compared to the S(NZ) 2,200,000 cost of the cyanide recovery system. <br />Based on the pilot plant results, estimates of the cost of cyanide recovery have been prepar@d on a per <br />tonne basis. The cost per day to operate the cyanide recovery process Including sulfuric acid, power for <br />the air supply, caustic, and lime Is S(NZ) 1.10/tonne. The cost assumes a power requirement bf 150 kw at <br />a cost of $(NZ) 0.08/kW-hr, and chemical costs 3 to 5 times higher than in the United States. <br />In terms of operating cost credits, there is a return for recovered cyanide and caustic contAined In the <br />scrubber sdution. Assuming a 90 percent recovery from a 200 mg/1 WAD cyanide slurry, the operating cost <br />credit is S(NZ) 2.17/tonne. The calculations assumed a sodium cyanide cost of $(NZ) 3.30/kg. the cyanide <br />usage rate Is low end assuming a more realistic cyanide concentration o1 300 mg/I and a 90 percent <br />recovery, the operating cost credit Increases to S(NZ) 3.23/tonne of ore processed. <br />Introduction of the cyanide recovery system reduces the downstream WAD cyanide concentratipn requiring <br />treatment from about 45.0 mg/I to 4.0 mg/I. On the basis of hydrogen peroxide consumption >tione, there <br />is a decrease In operating chemical costs of S(NZ) 1.08/tonne, assuming a peroxide cost of S(NZ) 1.56/kg <br />for 50 percent sdutlon, and a 250 percent theoretical excess of peroxide. <br />The net operating cost benefit for the cyanide recovery process Is S(NZ) 2.15/tonne of ore (Ke. 52.17 + <br />3t.08 - E1.10) or S(NZ) 1,550,000 fora 720,000-ton-per-year operation. The net operating cbst savings <br />amounts to over S(NZ) 12,000,000 during the eight-year life of the mine. <br />There are additional cost savings due to decreases In operating staff and other chemicals utilized (I.e. <br />copper sulfate) In the hydrogen peroxide treatment facility. Furthermore, there Is no need to line the <br />impoundment as would be case In many Installations In the U.S. Llning of an Impoundment designed for <br />the Gdden Cross Mine would require a several million ddlar expenditure, and would be very difficult to <br />Install due to the terrain. The anticipated capital operating cost savings are significant In an application o1 <br />low cyanide containing slurries and high chemical and power costs, with greater benefits realized In more <br />typical mining Installations. <br />The operating costs associated with Gdconda C.R.P. Including chemicals, power, and labor wlere E(AUS) <br />1.07/tonne, with a cost recovery of $(AUS) 2.i3/tonne of sdution treated. Neady 70 percent iof the cost <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.