My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_REVISION - M1988112 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
_REVISION - M1988112 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2021 9:23:56 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:38:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Name
MEMO-REVIEW OF BATTLE MOUNTAINS PROTOCOL DOCUMENT
From
POSEY
To
HUMPHRIES OEHLER PENDLETON STEVENS
Type & Sequence
TR6
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />there are few provisions for assuring that the commercial labs (the Vendors) will <br />supply consistently reliable analyses. Battle Mountain should prpvide for some <br />degree of quality assurance from their vendors, either through their own lab <br />personnel or through a third party who is familiar with these techniques. <br />10. Until the high cyanide levels in the ponds are brought down, all analyses for cyanide <br />(all compounds) from down-gradient wells and surface waters should be sent through <br />on "Rush" status. Turn-around should not exceed 10 days. Inability to meet this <br />schedule should be described in writing by the independent lab or labs. <br />Other analyses may be sent routine. <br />11. Dr. David E. Hyatt's comments. <br />The comments and criticisms of Dr. Hyatt should be addressed along with those from <br />the Division. <br />With respect, Dr. Hyatt's comment Number 2 regarding use of the ion specific <br />electrode technique should not be construed as an endorsement by the Division. The <br />ISE technique is not an EPA recognized method except, perhaps, as used in <br />conjunction with distillation. The Division has received cautionary information from <br />both the Colorado Department of Health and from Accu-Labs regarding this <br />technique. Use of the ISE for in-house monitoring may be useful, 64t the Division <br />will not accept data from this technique without verification of the results using <br />another EPA-accepted method. <br />PAGE BY PAGE COMMENTS <br />PAGE <br />NO. <br />COMMENT <br />1 Are there Monitor wells numbered M-3 or M-5? If so, where are they? <br />2 a. Exactly where is the sampling point mentioned in item (2) [top of page]? <br />b. Where are the two off-site wells [item (3), top of page]? <br />3 Item (5) [top of page] does not agree with item (1) [bottom of page 2]. Furthermore, <br />considering that the specific flow path of any leak from the tailings ponds to the Rito <br />Seco is not known, other sampling points need to be established. Considering both <br />these corrections and the need to establish more sampling points, It@m (5) should <br />read: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.