My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_REVISION - M1988112 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
_REVISION - M1988112 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2021 9:23:56 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:38:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Name
MEMO-REVIEW OF BATTLE MOUNTAINS PROTOCOL DOCUMENT
From
POSEY
To
HUMPHRIES OEHLER PENDLETON STEVENS
Type & Sequence
TR6
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />hydrologic gradient is established and until other down-gradient monitor wells are <br />installed. <br />3. Chain of custody should begin with the commercial laboratory that prepares the <br />sample containers for field sampling personnel. Third party samplers and vendors <br />should supply all collection devices, sample containers, and reagents including wash <br />solutions. <br />4. Free cyanide in the form of cyanide gas is, of course, a hazard to breathing, <br />particularly in closed spaces. According to MSHA personnel, in some settings, wind <br />may cause high concentrations of cyanide gas to be introduced to persons or animals. <br />However, in many outdoor settings, the gas may be dispersed to a 1@vel that would <br />be considered non-toxic. <br />Free cyanide in solution or any of the weak acid dissociable cyanide compounds may <br />also be hazardous if consumed. Animals, in particular, need to be protected from <br />the hazards of drinking water containing HCN. <br />Battle Mountain has raised the issue of the difficulty of analyzing far free cyanide, <br />and although we have yet to receive real proof of the accuracy of thCse statements, <br />the Division is inclined to believe that the statements bear some co~Asideration. <br />Battle Mountain Gold (and the Division) should consider the utility dnd practicality <br />of analyzing for free cyanide. WAD cyanide analyses should includC both the free <br />and weak acid dissociable components of cyanide, and thus a single analysis may be <br />more reasonable for both analytical and regulatory purposes. <br />5. Battle Mountain Gold (and the Division) should consider the time after which third- <br />party sampling will be either eliminated or reduced to oversight-type frequencies. <br />6. The Division does not understand the utility of not measuring major cations for water <br />quality (Table 4). At a minimum, BMG should explain why major Cations are not <br />to be analyzed. <br />7. Appendix D is essentially indecipherable without a code sheet tp describe the <br />headings. BMG should provide an explanation of the headings and ap~y abbreviated <br />information in [his appendix. <br />8. Please indicate the source of Appendix D, Appendix F, and Appendfix G. <br />9. In this protocol as in any, the operators should recognize that analytical labs need <br />to be checked periodically and to do so requires an established procedure. Battle <br />Mountain should have samples with known quantities of analytes and should submit <br />these periodically for analysis along with other analyses. In additiom, the operator <br />should prepare samples for "Round Robin" analyses, infra-laboratory comparisons, <br />and routine sample duplication. Except for some provision for field duplications, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.