My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_REVISION - M1988112 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
_REVISION - M1988112 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2021 9:23:56 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:38:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Name
MEMO-REVIEW OF BATTLE MOUNTAINS PROTOCOL DOCUMENT
From
POSEY
To
HUMPHRIES OEHLER PENDLETON STEVENS
Type & Sequence
TR6
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />r~ <br />u <br />"(5) Surface water monitoring systems (RS-1, RS-2, and RS-3) should continue to <br />be monitored quarterly. Surface water monitoring stations (RS-4, RS-5, RS-6, <br />and a new station on the Rito Seco, west of the tailings area, and in the flow <br />path of any potential leak from the tailings area) should be sampled bi- <br />weekly. <br />"Ground water monitoring stations (D87-24, M-1, and M-11) should continue <br />to be monitored quarterly. Groundwater monitoring stations (M-2, M-4, M-6, <br />M-7, M-8, M-9 and M-10) should be examined bi-weekly, and sampled if <br />sufficient sample is available. <br />"New ground water monitoring stations down gradient of th@ tailings pond <br />area, as required and approved by the MLRD, shall be sampled bi-weekly." <br />Items (1) through (4) in this section should be amended to account lot this amended <br />language. <br />5+ Section 2 (inclusive). BMG should reconsider the proposal to rinse all sampling <br />equipment with tap water and provide the Division evidence that the tap water at <br />San Luis, which is essentially groundwater, has a chemical composition similar <br />enough to that of the process water and to local surface water that concentrations of <br />evaporated salts on the sampling equipment will not affect any of the analyses <br />significantly. <br />7 Second full paragraph. It is well known that agitation of samples containing CN", in <br />the presence of CO,, will cause CN" to volatalize. <br />Therefore, if samples are to be filtered after they have been transporUed to a lab for <br />analysis, a study should be conducted showing that agitation duringtrar[sportationnas <br />a negligible effect on cyanide concentrations. If the lab receives a Container with <br />sample to be analyzed for CN" that is not completely full (or nearly so), or which <br />bears indications of leakage during shipment, that sample shall be noted by the ]ab. <br />If sufficient material remains to be sampled, that particular shall be re-sampled. <br />8 Section 2.1.7. I believe the EPA method requires that bottles be stored "below" 4 <br />degrees C rather than at "approximately" 4 degrees. BMG should check this figure <br />and respond accordingly. <br />13 Section 2.2.6. BMG or third-party samplers should make provisions for storing the <br />bailers, depth measuring devices, and other sampling equipment out mf the paths of <br />materials that could potentially contaminate the sampling materials. <br />14 Section 2.2.7. For those wells with a history of low to nil fluid production, the <br />presence of any fluid at all may be more important than the actual content of the <br />fluid or of the quality of the analysis, said quality having been affected by natural or <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.