My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1981-03-18_REVISION - M1977342
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977342
>
1981-03-18_REVISION - M1977342
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2021 12:09:02 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 8:21:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977342
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/18/1981
Doc Name
RESPONSE TO AMENDMENT ADEQUACY LETTER OF 02-18-81 HENDERSON PN M77-342
From
CLIMAX MOLYBDENUM CO
To
MLRD
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~ <br />Henderson Permit #77-342 <br />March 19, 1981 <br />Page Eight <br /> <br />directly because we feel there is very little <br />likelihood of contamination. As indicated on page <br />6-35 of the existing permit, "...Ute Park is a <br />tertiary lake bed with little continuity <br />(stratification) in the sedimentary material due to <br />multiple deposition and erosion processes. This <br />complexly stratified material should preclude <br />percolation or infiltration of water into the <br />ground water system." Also, the soils map and <br />description in the existing permit verifies that <br />Ute Park soils are clayey. Also, the geology of <br />the area indicates the existence of an impermeable <br />dike across the mouth of Ute Park (which probably <br />formed the tertiary lake). This dike would serve <br />as an effective aquaclude to ground water movement, <br />causing the water to surface at this point. There <br />is no evidence of this occurring. <br />5. Has the State Engineer been contacted concerning the <br />Lost Creek Reservoir? <br />Yes <br />F. Wildlife Information <br />1. Please describe the status of the wildlife monitoring <br />program and summarize the data gathered to date. <br />Refer to page 6-29 of the existing permit for a <br />description of the monitoring program. The program <br />was initiated in 1975 and is ongoing. In general, <br />the study seems to indicate that the large mammal <br />populations have increased since the survey was <br />initiated. The survey also indicates that the <br />animals are using our industrial area as a refuge. <br />As with the water data, the reports are available <br />for inspection at our offices if you desire. <br />2. Which areas of new disturbance are critical to wildlife, <br />example - fawning areas, winter range, migration routes, <br />etc.? <br />The only lands requested in the amendment which <br />protrude from existing affected lands are the <br />interceptor canal and the additional reservoir. <br />Although all AMAX land is used by large mammals, <br />the most intensively used winter range and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.