My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-08-23_REVISION - M1982015
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1982015
>
2006-08-23_REVISION - M1982015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:53:32 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 6:59:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1982015
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/23/2006
Doc Name
Various emails from Jodi Villa/DRMS
From
Jodi Villa / DRMS
To
Jodi Villa/ DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a) Provide a notarized agreement between the Applicant and the <br />Person(s) having an interest in the structure, that the Applicant is to provide <br />compensation for any damage to the structure; or <br />b) Where such an agreement cannot be reached, the Applicant shall <br />provide an appropriate engineering evaluation that demonstrates that such structure shall <br />not be damaged by activities occurring at the mining operation; or <br />c) Where such structure is a utility, the applicant may supply a <br />notarized letter, on utility letterhead, from the owner(s) of the utility that the mining <br />and reclamation activities, as proposed, will have "no negative effect" on their utility. <br />Language in your letter looks good. <br />Thanks, <br />-Deb <br />Deb Gonima <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Rm 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />www.mining.state.co.us <br />ph. 303-866-4179 <br />fax 303-832-8106 <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Jodi Villa [mailto:JVi11aOMeurer.com] <br />Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 8:23 AM <br />To: Deb Gonima (E-mail) <br />Cc: Tyler Packard (E-mail); Brad Davis (E-mail); Fred Tafoya (E-mail) <br />Subject: 2nd Adequacy Review Question (3811-DMG) <br />Deb, <br />In your second Adequacy Review Letter, item 26c requires second notarized letters from <br />utility companies. In your list of companies, you include CDOT and ditch companies, which <br />were not required originally. You told us before that the letters only needed to be from <br />utilities. CDOT has been sent notification regarding the berm/rip-rap and they have the <br />opportunity to comment; and there are no ditches within 200' of the berm. Shouldn't we <br />just be getting letters from companies that we originally were required to obtain? <br />Attached is a draft of the new letter for your review. Please let me know if this is <br />acceptable. <br />Thanks, <br />Jodi Villa <br />Project Manager <br />P.S. Any luck scheduling a meeting with Mr. Berry? <br />«utility letter 2.doc » <br />Meurer & Associates, Inc. <br />Engineers ~ Designers ~ Consultants <br />143 Union Boulevard, Suite 600 <br />Lakewood, CO 80228 <br />TEL: 303-985-3636 <br />FAX: 303-985-3800 <br />TOLL FREE: 1-866-535-5285 <br />EMAIL: jvillaOmeurer,com <br />WEB: www.meurer.com <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.