Laserfiche WebLink
._ <br />Shaffers Crossing Ouany Petition to Amend ODP: Extend Allowable timeframe to complete Mining <br />b) Reclamation Plan Review <br />This applicant proposes an amendment to the existing ODP in part to address inconsistencies in <br />the original reclamation plan filed in 1979. The existing documents outlining the mining <br />procedure and development of all extractable resources on the site are vague and inconsistent, <br />for example, at least three separately identifiable bench confrgurations are listed as possibilities <br />in the existing plan. We propose providing a corrected and accurate plan to which we will adhere <br />during mining, Such a plan will idemtfy the phases of reclamation (reclamation schedule), actual <br />extractable blocks during mineral extraction of commercial aggregate as defined in the ODP, <br />proposed bench configuration, locations of stockpiled material including reclaim and topsoil <br />shown in the attached Grading & Erosion Control Plan, drainage diversion features, both <br />temporary and permanent also shown in the attached Grading & Erosion Control Plan. This <br />plan identifies the anticipated duration of all phases of mineral extraction of commercial <br />aggregate as from between ten (10) to fifteen (15) years to complete. <br />xicting Site Conditions <br />At the time of due diligence and discovery and between July 2002 following mobilization to the <br />site, site investigations and a survey of the SSW comer of the property revealed that no clear <br />bench configuration exists at all. In short, there is no evidence that arty of the proposed bench <br />designs have been adhered to during the development to date of the site. Furthermore, the <br />highwall exhibits dangerous and unsafe conditions, with numerous hang-up rocks, an MSHA <br />violation. The outcropping material had been stripped to bedrock inconsistently indicating a <br />'highgrading' of material. Blasting on 12/09/02 revealed old half-casts along the 7990 bench <br />elevation and adjacent to the existing highwali. These are approximately an 1-7/8" diameter half <br />cast. A clearly visible kerf had been stripped in an unplanned manner during August 2000 by <br />another operator at the site, rewverfng mainly decomposed surface material as a spoil source <br />for local road development from the 8030 to 8D10 elevations. There was no indication of any <br />reclamation on the NW exposed benches. <br />As many as three identifiable bench configurations are curently listed in the original reclamation <br />plan. These are <br />20 by 10 <br />20by8 <br />45 by 15 <br />We propose the following changes to the bench configuration. We.propose the implementation <br />of a standard 36 by 12 bench design for final highwall configuration The final pit limits v~ill cell for <br />a 20 foot setback from property boundaries. This is fo allow for traffic arountl the pit limits and for <br />egress during reclamation. At least 35% of the area will be preserved as open space as defined <br />under the Conifer/285 Corridor Area Community Plan DESIGN GUIDELINES. Factors affecting <br />the proposed bench design include the following: <br />• Poisons Ratio and Risk Analysis of Potential Slope Failure (determined to <br />be Low) as a direct result of steepening the slope <br />JC 00640 <br />PetersonlElk Creek <br />