ENFORCE37651 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ACiz Laboratories, Inc. 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 CO Div. of Reclamation Mining & Safey ACZ Project ID: L58843 L58843-01 WG213365 Total Hot Plate Digestion M200.2 ICP WG213161 Total ReceveraDle Digestion M200.2 ICP-MS WG213580 Iron, total M200.71CP WG213447 Mercury, total M245.1 CVA4 WG213309 Selenium, dissolved M200.8 ICP-MS WG213599 Nitrate/Nitrite as N M353.2 - H2SO4 preserved WG213851 Nitrogen, ammonia M350.1 -Automated Phenata WG213155 Phosphorus, ortho dissolved M365.1 -Automated Ascorbic Acid WG213830 Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C M160.1 - GrevimeMc M760.1 - Gravimetdc WG213400 Residue, Non-Filterable (TSS) @105C M160.2 - Gravimetric L5880}02 WG213396 Total Remverable Dipestwn WG213580 Iraq total WG213447 Mercury, total WG213599 Niuate/Nitrite as N WG213851 Nitrogen, ammonia WG213155 Phosphorus, ortho dissolved WG213830 Residue, Filtereble (TDS) @180C WG213400 Residue, Non-Filterable (TSS) @105G M200.21CP M200.71CP M245.1 CVAA M245.1 CVAA M353.2 - H2SO4 preserved M350.1 -Automated Phenata M365.1 -Automated Ascorbic Acid M160.1 - Gravimetnc M160.2 - Gravimetdc DD Sample required dilution due to matrix color or odor. DD Sample required dilution due to matrix color or odor. M1 Ma[rix spike recovery was high, the meNOd control sample recevery was acceptable. MA Recovery for either the spike or spike duplicate was outside of the acceptance limits; the RPD was within the acceptance limits. M1 Matrix spike recovery was high, the method control sample recovery was acceptable. RA Relative Percent DiRerence (RPD) was not used for data validation because the sample concentration is too low for accurte evaluation (< 10x MDL). RA Relative Percent DiRerence (RPD) was not used far data validation because the sample wncentration is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10z MDL). RA Relative Percent DiRerence (RPD) was not used for data validation because the sample concentration is loo low for accurate evaluation (< 10z MDL). FiC Initial analysis within holding time. Reanalysis was past holding time, which was required due to a GC failure durrg the initial analysis. 7A TDS concentration is based on a final residue greater than 2110 mg. R4 Relative Percent Drfference (RPD) was not used for tlata validation because the sample concentration is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). l7A Sample container with preservation type specified by the method was not available for analysis. Alternate sample container was used. M7 Matrix spike recovery was high, the method control sample recevery was acceptable. L13 Sample diluton required due to insufficient sample. MA Recovery for either the Spike or spike duplicate was outside of the acceptance limits; the RPD was within the acceptance limits. RA Relative Percent DiRerence (RPD) was not used for data validation because the sample concentration is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). R4 Relative Percent DiRerence (RPD) was not used for data validation because the sample concentrlion is too low for aaurate evaluation (< tOx MDL). RA Relative Percent DiRerence (RPD) was not used for data validation because the sample concentration is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10z MDL). FIC Initial analysis within holding time. Reanalysis was past holding time, which was required due to a GC failure during the initial analysis. RA Relative Pament D'rfference (RPb) was not used for data validation because the sample concenVation is too low for accurete evaluation (< 10z MDL). REPAD.15.06.05.01 L58843: Page 16 of 25