My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE37651
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE37651
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:46:34 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 3:40:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
10/9/2006
Doc Name
Analytical Results Report
From
ACZ Laboratories
To
DRMS
Violation No.
CV2006006
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ACiz Laboratories, Inc. <br />2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 <br />CO Div. of Reclamation Mining & Safey <br />ACZ Project ID: L58843 <br />L58843-01 WG213365 Total Hot Plate Digestion M200.2 ICP <br />WG213161 Total ReceveraDle Digestion M200.2 ICP-MS <br />WG213580 Iron, total M200.71CP <br />WG213447 Mercury, total M245.1 CVA4 <br />WG213309 Selenium, dissolved M200.8 ICP-MS <br />WG213599 Nitrate/Nitrite as N M353.2 - H2SO4 preserved <br />WG213851 Nitrogen, ammonia M350.1 -Automated Phenata <br />WG213155 Phosphorus, ortho dissolved M365.1 -Automated Ascorbic <br /> Acid <br />WG213830 Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C M160.1 - GrevimeMc <br />M760.1 - Gravimetdc <br />WG213400 Residue, Non-Filterable (TSS) @105C M160.2 - Gravimetric <br />L5880}02 WG213396 Total Remverable Dipestwn <br />WG213580 Iraq total <br />WG213447 Mercury, total <br />WG213599 Niuate/Nitrite as N <br />WG213851 Nitrogen, ammonia <br />WG213155 Phosphorus, ortho dissolved <br />WG213830 Residue, Filtereble (TDS) @180C <br />WG213400 Residue, Non-Filterable (TSS) @105G <br />M200.21CP <br />M200.71CP <br />M245.1 CVAA <br />M245.1 CVAA <br />M353.2 - H2SO4 preserved <br />M350.1 -Automated Phenata <br />M365.1 -Automated Ascorbic <br />Acid <br />M160.1 - Gravimetnc <br />M160.2 - Gravimetdc <br />DD Sample required dilution due to matrix color or odor. <br />DD Sample required dilution due to matrix color or odor. <br />M1 Ma[rix spike recovery was high, the meNOd control sample <br />recevery was acceptable. <br />MA Recovery for either the spike or spike duplicate was outside <br />of the acceptance limits; the RPD was within the <br />acceptance limits. <br />M1 Matrix spike recovery was high, the method control sample <br />recovery was acceptable. <br />RA Relative Percent DiRerence (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurte evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />RA Relative Percent DiRerence (RPD) was not used far data <br />validation because the sample wncentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10z MDL). <br />RA Relative Percent DiRerence (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is loo low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10z MDL). <br />FiC Initial analysis within holding time. Reanalysis was past <br />holding time, which was required due to a GC failure durrg <br />the initial analysis. <br />7A TDS concentration is based on a final residue greater than <br />2110 mg. <br />R4 Relative Percent Drfference (RPD) was not used for tlata <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />l7A Sample container with preservation type specified by the <br />method was not available for analysis. Alternate sample <br />container was used. <br />M7 Matrix spike recovery was high, the method control sample <br />recevery was acceptable. <br />L13 Sample diluton required due to insufficient sample. <br />MA Recovery for either the Spike or spike duplicate was outside <br />of the acceptance limits; the RPD was within the <br />acceptance limits. <br />RA Relative Percent DiRerence (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />R4 Relative Percent DiRerence (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentrlion is too low for <br />aaurate evaluation (< tOx MDL). <br />RA Relative Percent DiRerence (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10z MDL). <br />FIC Initial analysis within holding time. Reanalysis was past <br />holding time, which was required due to a GC failure during <br />the initial analysis. <br />RA Relative Pament D'rfference (RPb) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concenVation is too low for <br />accurete evaluation (< 10z MDL). <br />REPAD.15.06.05.01 <br />L58843: Page 16 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.