Laserfiche WebLink
ACZ Laboratories, Inc. <br />2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 <br />L58843-03 WG213365 Total Hot Plate Digestion M200.2 ICP <br />WG213161 Total Recoverable Digestion M200.2 ICP-MS <br />WG213580 Iron, total M200.71CP <br />WG213447 Mercury, total M245.1 CVAA <br />WG273309 Selenium, dissolved M200.81CP-MS <br />WG213599 Nitrate/Nitrite as N M353.2 - H2SO4 preservetl <br />WG213851 Nitrogen, ammonia M350.1 -Automated Phenale <br />WG213155 Phosphorus, ortho dissolved M365.1 -Automated Ascorbic <br />Acid <br />WG213830 Residue. Filterable (TDS) Q180C M160.1 - GrevimeMc <br />M160.1 - Gravimetric <br />WG213400 Residue, Non-Filtemble (TSS) (a1105C M160.2 - Gmvimelrk <br />L88843-04 WG213580 Iron, total <br />WG213447 Mercury, total <br />WG213309 Selenium, tlissolvetl <br />WG213599 NiVateMBrite as N <br />WG213851 Nitrogen, ammonia <br />WG213155 Phosphorus, ortho dissolved <br />M200.7 ICP <br />M245.1 GVAA <br />M200.8 ICP-MS <br />M353.2 - H2504 preserved <br />M350.1 -Automated Phonate <br />M365.1 -Automated Ascorbic <br />Acid <br />WG213830 Residue. Fikerable (TDS) QteOC M760.1 - Gravinretric <br />WG213400 Residue, Non-Filterable (TSS) @105C M160.2 - Gmvimetnc <br />W Sample required tlilution due to matrix color or odor. <br />DD Sample required dilution due to matrix color or odor. <br />M7 Matrix spike recovery was high, the method control sample <br />recovery was acceptable. <br />M4. Recovery for either the spike or spike tlupliwte was outside <br />of the acceptance limits; Ne RPD was within the <br />acceptance limits. <br />M1 Matrix spike recovery was high, the method control sample <br />recovery was acceptable. <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />valitlation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 1 ~ MDL). <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< tOx MDL). <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation beceuse the sample concentration is too krrr for <br />awumle evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />FiC Initial analysis within holding lime. Reanalysis was past <br />holding time, which was required due to a GC failure during <br />the initial analysis. <br />ZO TDS concentration is based on a final residue greater than <br />200 mg. <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MOL}. <br />M1 Matrix spike recovery was high, the method control sample <br />recovery was acceptable. <br />AAA Recovery for either the spike or spike duplicate was outsitle <br />of the acceptance limits; Ne RPD was within the <br />acceptance limits. <br />M1 Matrix spike recovery was high, the method control sample <br />rewvery was acceptable. <br />RA Relative Percent DiRerence (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation beceusa the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurete evaluation (< tOx MDL). <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MOL). <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for tlata <br />validation because the sample wncentration is too low for <br />acwreta evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />FiC Initial analysis within holding time. Reanalysis was Oast <br />holding time, which was required due to a DC failure during <br />the initial analysis. <br />R4 Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation Deceuse the sample wncentration is too low for <br />acwrele evaluation (< 10x MOL}. <br />REPAD.15.06.05.01 <br />L58843: Page 17 of 25 <br />CO Div. of Reclamation Mining & Safey ACZ Project ID: L58843 <br />