Laserfiche WebLink
~~ <br />I~ <br />I~ <br />i~ <br />'~ <br />• • 24 <br />1 X days of the hearing date so they will know whether or <br />2 not we are really going to hear those or not, Frank? <br />3 MR. JOHNSON: I suggest that we have some <br />4 kind of prehearing conference. <br />5 CHAIRMAN O'CONNOR: Yes. I was going to <br />6 suggest that after we had this continuance request. I <br />7 think that's appropriate. <br />8 MR. JOHNSON: I think that solves 'the <br />9 problem and allows us to hash out these issues <br />10 beforehand, and if they can't be hashed out before=_ the <br />11 November meeting, then all the parties just submi~: some <br />12 sort of joint motion. <br />13 MR. COOLEY: At least we could have each <br />14 side send one person up here and make an appearan~~e on <br />15 it. That's better than inconveniencing everybody. <br />16 That's about 20 people. <br />17 MR. BANTA: Since we are already iii a new <br />18 hearing, I would presume that notices under the A]'A--you <br />19 don't to have do that anymore--our obligation would be to <br />20 contact the parties through some prudent amount oi` time. <br />21 MR. JOHNSON: I suppose, technically, the <br />22 one issue on the violation is over, and we are starting <br />23 new. I don't know if I answered your question. ]: don't <br />24 know if we solved the problem which you raised. <br />~5 CHAIRMAN O'CONNOR: Well, we are ire a <br />